» Articles » PMID: 38553942

The Quantitative Parameters Based on Marrow Metabolism Derived from Synthetic MRI: A Pilot Study of Prognostic Value in Participants with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Overview
Journal Cancer Med
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Mar 30
PMID 38553942
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The value of SyMRI-derived parameters from lumbar marrow for predicting early treatment response and optimizing the risk stratification of the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) in participants with multiple myeloma (MM) is unknown.

Methods: We prospectively enrolled participants with newly diagnosed MM before treatment. The SyMRI of lumbar marrow was used to calculate T1, T2, and PD values and the clinical features were collected. All participants were divided into good response (≥VGPR) and poor response (<VGPR) groups after four treatment cycles. Univariate, multivariate analyses and ROC were used to identify prognostic significance. Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to compare the SyMRI parameters between genders. The value of optimizing the risk stratification was analyzed by Fisher's exact tests at each R-ISS stage.

Results: Fifty-nine participants (good response, n = 33; poor response, n = 26) were evaluated. The bone marrow plasma cell percentage, β-microglobulin, T1 and T2 value were difference between two groups (all p < 0.05). The T1 (odds ratio 1.003, p = 0.005) and T2 values (odds ratio 0.910, p = 0.002) were independent predictors and the AUC and cut-off values were 0.787, 967.2 ms and 0.784, 75.9 ms, respectively. There were no significant differences in SyMRI parameters between genders. Participants with both T1 value ≥967.2 ms and T2 value ≤75.9 ms in the R-ISS II stage were potentially to get poor response.

Conclusions: Synthetic MRI is a promising tool for predicting early treatment response to MM and promoting R-ISS II stage risk stratification.

Citing Articles

The quantitative parameters based on marrow metabolism derived from synthetic MRI: A pilot study of prognostic value in participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Cui S, Guo Y, Niu W, Li J, Bian W, Wu W Cancer Med. 2024; 13(7):e7109.

PMID: 38553942 PMC: 10980927. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7109.

References
1.
Greipp P, San Miguel J, Durie B, Crowley J, Barlogie B, Blade J . International staging system for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(15):3412-20. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.242. View

2.
Shen Y, Mishima Y, Shi J, Sklavenitis-Pistofidis R, Redd R, Moschetta M . Progression signature underlies clonal evolution and dissemination of multiple myeloma. Blood. 2020; 137(17):2360-2372. PMC: 8085483. DOI: 10.1182/blood.2020005885. View

3.
Zhang W, Zhu J, Xu X, Fan G . Synthetic MRI of the lumbar spine at 3.0 T: feasibility and image quality comparison with conventional MRI. Acta Radiol. 2019; 61(4):461-470. DOI: 10.1177/0284185119871670. View

4.
Hwang S, Panicek D . Magnetic resonance imaging of bone marrow in oncology, Part 1. Skeletal Radiol. 2007; 36(10):913-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-007-0309-3. View

5.
Zhao L, Liang M, Xie L, Yang Y, Zhang H, Zhao X . Prediction of pathological prognostic factors of rectal cancer by relaxation maps from synthetic magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2021; 138:109658. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109658. View