» Articles » PMID: 38539269

Longitudinal Normative Standards for Cognitive Tests and Composites Using Harmonized Data from Two Wisconsin AD-risk-enriched Cohorts

Abstract

Introduction: Published norms are typically cross-sectional and often are not sensitive to preclinical cognitive changes due to dementia. We developed and validated demographically adjusted cross-sectional and longitudinal normative standards using harmonized outcomes from two Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk-enriched cohorts.

Methods: Data from the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention and the Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center were combined. Quantile regression was used to develop unconditional (cross-sectional) and conditional (longitudinal) normative standards for 18 outcomes using data from cognitively unimpaired participants (N = 1390; mean follow-up = 9.25 years). Validity analyses (N = 2456) examined relationships between percentile scores (centiles), consensus-based cognitive statuses, and AD biomarker levels.

Results: Unconditional and conditional centiles were lower in those with consensus-based impairment or biomarker positivity. Similarly, quantitative biomarker levels were higher in those whose centiles suggested decline.

Discussion: This study presents normative standards for cognitive measures sensitive to pre-clinical changes. Future directions will investigate potential clinical applications of longitudinal normative standards.

Highlights: Quantile regression was used to construct longitudinal norms for cognitive tests. Poorer percentile scores were related to concurrent diagnosis and Alzheimer's disease biomarkers. A ShinyApp was built to display test scores and norms and flag low performance.

Citing Articles

Targeted Proteomic Biomarker Profiling Using NULISA in a cohort enriched with risk for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.

Rea Reyes R, Wilson R, Langhough R, Studer R, Jonaitis E, Oomens J medRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39649596 PMC: 11623751. DOI: 10.1101/2024.11.28.24318162.


Visual read of [F-18]florquinitau PET that includes and extends beyond the mesial temporal lobe is associated with increased plasma pTau217 and cognitive decline in a cohort that is enriched with risk for Alzheimer's disease.

Rea Reyes R, Cody K, Wilson R, Zetterberg H, Chin N, Jonaitis E Alzheimers Dement. 2024; 21(2):e14406.

PMID: 39560002 PMC: 11848396. DOI: 10.1002/alz.14406.


Association of neighborhood disadvantage with cognitive function and cortical disorganization in an unimpaired cohort.

Safai A, Jonaitis E, Langhough R, Buckingha W, Johnson S, Powell W ArXiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38947926 PMC: 11213155.


Longitudinal normative standards for cognitive tests and composites using harmonized data from two Wisconsin AD-risk-enriched cohorts.

Jonaitis E, Hermann B, Mueller K, Clark L, Du L, Betthauser T Alzheimers Dement. 2024; 20(5):3305-3321.

PMID: 38539269 PMC: 11095443. DOI: 10.1002/alz.13774.

References
1.
Donohue M, Sun C, Raman R, Insel P, Aisen P . Cross-validation of optimized composites for preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2017; 3(1):123-129. PMC: 5527287. DOI: 10.1016/j.trci.2016.12.001. View

2.
Maidman A, Wang L, Zhou X, Sherwood B . Quantile partially linear additive model for data with dropouts and an application to modeling cognitive decline. Stat Med. 2023; 42(16):2729-2745. DOI: 10.1002/sim.9745. View

3.
Hughes C, Berg L, Danziger W, COBEN L, Martin R . A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatry. 1982; 140:566-72. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.140.6.566. View

4.
Jak A, Bondi M, Delano-Wood L, Wierenga C, Corey-Bloom J, Salmon D . Quantification of five neuropsychological approaches to defining mild cognitive impairment. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009; 17(5):368-75. PMC: 2743175. DOI: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e31819431d5. View

5.
Berman S, Koscik R, Clark L, Mueller K, Bluder L, Galvin J . Use of the Quick Dementia Rating System (QDRS) as an Initial Screening Measure in a Longitudinal Cohort at Risk for Alzheimer's Disease. J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2017; 1(1):9-13. PMC: 5557032. DOI: 10.3233/ADR-170004. View