» Articles » PMID: 38522095

Successes and Pitfalls in Orphan Drug Development for Sickle Cell disease

Overview
Journal Blood Adv
Specialty Hematology
Date 2024 Mar 24
PMID 38522095
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a hereditary red cell disorder with a large disease burden at a global level. In the United States and Europe, medicines may qualify for orphan designation (OD), a regulatory status that provides incentives to boost development. We evaluated the development of new therapies for SCD using data for OD granted in the United States and Europe over the last 2 decades (2000-2021). We analyzed their characteristics, pathophysiological targets, trends, and OD sponsors. We then investigated the approval outcomes, including the phase success rate and reasons for discontinuation across different variables. We identified 57 ODs for SCD: 43 (75.4%) small molecules, 32 (56.1%) for oral administration, and 36 (63.1%) for chronic use to prevent SCD complications. At the end of the study (2021), development of 34 of 57 ODs was completed. Four ODs were approved with a success rate of 11.8%. Products targeting upstream causative events of SCD pathophysiology had a 1.8 higher success rate compared with products targeting disease consequences. Large companies showed a fourfold higher success rate compared with small-medium enterprises. Failures in clinical development were mainly seen in phase 3 for a lack of efficacy on vaso-occlusive crisis as the primary study end point, likely related to variable definitions and heterogeneity of pain scoring and treatment. Both advances in SCD knowledge and regulatory incentives paved the way for new therapies for SCD. Our finding of high failure rates in late-stage clinical development signals the need for better early-stage predictive models, also in the context of meaningful clinical end points.

Citing Articles

Globalization in clinical drug development for sickle cell disease.

Costa E, Ware R, Tshilolo L, Makani J, Leufkens H, Luzzatto L Am J Hematol. 2024; 100(1):4-9.

PMID: 39530361 PMC: 11625986. DOI: 10.1002/ajh.27525.

References
1.
Simoens S . Pricing and reimbursement of orphan drugs: the need for more transparency. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011; 6:42. PMC: 3132155. DOI: 10.1186/1750-1172-6-42. View

2.
Ataga K, Reid M, Ballas S, Yasin Z, Bigelow C, James L . Improvements in haemolysis and indicators of erythrocyte survival do not correlate with acute vaso-occlusive crises in patients with sickle cell disease: a phase III randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of the Gardos channel blocker.... Br J Haematol. 2011; 153(1):92-104. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08520.x. View

3.
Steinberg M, Mccarthy W, Castro O, Ballas S, Armstrong F, Smith W . The risks and benefits of long-term use of hydroxyurea in sickle cell anemia: A 17.5 year follow-up. Am J Hematol. 2010; 85(6):403-8. PMC: 2879711. DOI: 10.1002/ajh.21699. View

4.
Fernando K, Menon S, Jansen K, Naik P, Nucci G, Roberts J . Achieving end-to-end success in the clinic: Pfizer's learnings on R&D productivity. Drug Discov Today. 2021; 27(3):697-704. PMC: 8719639. DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2021.12.010. View

5.
Jensen M, Castarlenas E, Tome-Pires C, Vega R, Sanchez-Rodriguez E, Miro J . The Number of Ratings Needed for Valid Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials: Replication and Extension. Pain Med. 2015; 16(9):1764-72. DOI: 10.1111/pme.12823. View