» Articles » PMID: 38500480

Introduction of Unit-Dose Care in the 1,125 Bed Teaching Hospital: Practical Experience and Time Saving on Wards

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Health Services
Date 2024 Mar 19
PMID 38500480
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The shortage of nursing staff as well as the slow progress in the German health care system's digitalisation has gained much attention due to COVID-19. Patient-specific medication management using the unit-dose dispensing system (UDDS) has the potential for a lasting and positive influence on both digitalisation and the relief of nursing staff.

Methods: Nursing staff UDDS-acceptance was determined via a validated online survey. For the evaluation of stock keeping on the wards, the delivery quantities were determined for a comparative period before and after the introduction of the UDDS. The time required for on-ward medication-related processes on ward before and after the introduction of UDDS was recorded based on a survey form and the nursing relief in full-time equivalent (FTE) was calculated using the data obtained.

Results: We show that nurses appreciate the UDDS and confirm a significant reduction in drug stocks on the wards. The UDDS reduces the time needed to dispense medications from 4.52 ± 0.35 min to 1.67 ± 0.15 min/day/patient. In relation to the entire medication process, this corresponds to a reduction of 50% per day and per patient. Based on 40,000 patients/year and a supply of 1,125 beds with unit-dose blisters, 7.36 FTE nursing staff can be relieved per year. In contrast, 6.5 FTE in the hospital pharmacy are required for supplying the hospitals.

Conclusion: UDDS is well accepted by nurses, reduces stock levels on ward, and fulfils criteria as a nursing-relief measure.

Citing Articles

Hospital pharmacy implementation of a unit dose dispensing system: A qualitative interview study to determine experiences, views and attitudes of nursing staff.

Steindl-Schonhuber T, Drechsel T, Gittler G, Weidmann A Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2025; 17:100566.

PMID: 39959691 PMC: 11830281. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100566.

References
1.
Davies E, Green C, Mottram D, Rowe P, Pirmohamed M . Emergency re-admissions to hospital due to adverse drug reactions within 1 year of the index admission. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010; 70(5):749-55. PMC: 2997315. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03751.x. View

2.
Hanlon J, Weinberger M, Samsa G, Schmader K, Uttech K, Lewis I . A randomized, controlled trial of a clinical pharmacist intervention to improve inappropriate prescribing in elderly outpatients with polypharmacy. Am J Med. 1996; 100(4):428-37. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9343(97)89519-8. View

3.
Blassmann U, Morath B, Fischer A, Knoth H, Hoppe-Tichy T . [Medication safety in hospitals : Integration of clinical pharmacists to reduce drug-related problems in the inpatient setting]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2018; 61(9):1103-1110. DOI: 10.1007/s00103-018-2788-x. View

4.
Franklin B, OGrady K, Donyai P, Jacklin A, Barber N . The impact of a closed-loop electronic prescribing and administration system on prescribing errors, administration errors and staff time: a before-and-after study. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007; 16(4):279-84. PMC: 2464943. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2006.019497. View

5.
Ahtiainen H, Kallio M, Airaksinen M, Holmstrom A . Safety, time and cost evaluation of automated and semi-automated drug distribution systems in hospitals: a systematic review. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2020; 27(5):253-262. PMC: 7447254. DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-001791. View