» Articles » PMID: 36452222

The Impact of Pharmacists' Interventions Within the Closed Loop Medication Management Process on Medication Safety: An Analysis in a German University Hospital

Abstract

Single elements of the Closed Loop Medication Management process (CLMM), including electronic prescribing, involvement of clinical pharmacists (CPs), patient individual logistics and digital administration/documentation, have shown to improve medication safety and patient health outcomes. The impact of the complete CLMM on patient safety, as reflected in pharmacists' interventions (PIs), is largely unknown. To evaluate the extent and characterization of routine PIs performed by hospital-wide CPs at a university hospital with an implemented CLMM. This single-center study included all interventions documented by CPs on five self-chosen working days within 1 month using the validated online-database DokuPIK (Documentation of Pharmacists' Interventions in the Hospital). Based on different workflows, two groups of CPs were compared. One group operated as a part of the CLMM, the "Closed Loop Clinical Pharmacists" (CL-CPs), while the other group worked less dependent of the CLMM, the "Process Detached Clinical Pharmacists" (PD-CPs). The professional experience and the number of medication reviews were entered in an online survey. Combined pseudonymized datasets were analyzed descriptively after anonymization. A total of 1,329 PIs were documented by nine CPs. Overall CPs intervened in every fifth medication review. The acceptance rate of PIs was 91.9%. The most common reasons were the categories "drugs" (e.g., indication, choice of formulation/drug and documentation/transcription) with 42.7%, followed by "dose" with 29.6%. One-quarter of PIs referred to the therapeutic subgroup "J01 antibacterials for systemic use." Of the 1,329 underlying PIs, 1,295 were classified as medication errors (MEs) and their vast majority (81.5%) was rated as "error, no harm" (NCC MERP categories B-D). Among PIs performed by CL-CPs ( = 1,125), the highest proportion of errors was categorized as B (56.5%), while in the group of PIs from PD-CPs ( = 170) errors categorized as C (68.2%) dominated ( < 0.001). Our study shows that a structured CLMM enables CPs to perform a high number of medication reviews while detecting and solving MEs at an early stage before they can cause harm to the patient. Based on key quality indicators for medication safety, the complete CLMM provides a suitable framework for the efficient medication management of inpatients.

Citing Articles

Implementation of pharmaceutical strategies using the PDCA cycle for standardized management of cancer pain medications.

Luo W, Huang H, Zhou Y, Min J, Wang C Support Care Cancer. 2025; 33(3):163.

PMID: 39920344 PMC: 11805850. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-025-09228-9.


Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of PHAROS, a perioperative pharmaceutical management intervention for older adults - a qualitative interview study from the perspective of healthcare providers.

Schonfeld M, Rinke J, Langebrake C, Kriston L, Olotu C, Kiefmann R BMC Geriatr. 2025; 25(1):47.

PMID: 39838283 PMC: 11748341. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05652-4.


Drug Therapy-related Problems Detected by Clinical Pharmacists in a Closed Loop Medication Management; A Cross-sectional Study in UAE.

Selim F, Baig M, Magoury M, Ahmed W, Mahmoud M Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2024; 13(1):e16.

PMID: 39670239 PMC: 11635537. DOI: 10.22037/aaem.v13i1.2470.


Enhancing drug therapy in ostomy patients: Best practice recommendations for medication management.

Berger V, Reeh M, Scherer M, Harterich S, Moller S, Wansing E PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0305047.

PMID: 38843261 PMC: 11156294. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305047.


Introduction of Unit-Dose Care in the 1,125 Bed Teaching Hospital: Practical Experience and Time Saving on Wards.

Herrmann S, Giesel-Gerstmeier J, Steiner T, Lendholt F, Fenske D J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024; 17:1137-1145.

PMID: 38500480 PMC: 10946279. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S450203.


References
1.
Langebrake C, Hohmann C, Lezius S, Lueb M, Picksak G, Walter W . Clinical pharmacists' interventions across German hospitals: results from a repetitive cross-sectional study. Int J Clin Pharm. 2021; 44(1):64-71. PMC: 8866273. DOI: 10.1007/s11096-021-01313-3. View

2.
Cuvelier E, Robert L, Musy E, Rousseliere C, Marcilly R, Gautier S . The clinical pharmacist's role in enhancing the relevance of a clinical decision support system. Int J Med Inform. 2021; 155:104568. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104568. View

3.
Bedouch P, Tessier A, Baudrant M, Labarere J, Foroni L, Calop J . Computerized physician order entry system combined with on-ward pharmacist: analysis of pharmacists' interventions. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011; 18(4):911-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01704.x. View

4.
Rothschild J . Computerized physician order entry in the critical care and general inpatient setting: a narrative review. J Crit Care. 2005; 19(4):271-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2004.08.006. View

5.
Bedouch P, Allenet B, Grass A, Labarere J, Brudieu E, Bosson J . Drug-related problems in medical wards with a computerized physician order entry system. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2009; 34(2):187-95. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2008.00990.x. View