» Articles » PMID: 38491021

Math Items About Real-world Content Lower Test-scores of Students from Families with Low Socioeconomic Status

Overview
Journal NPJ Sci Learn
Specialty Psychology
Date 2024 Mar 16
PMID 38491021
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In many countries, standardized math tests are important for achieving academic success. Here, we examine whether content of items, the story that explains a mathematical question, biases performance of low-SES students. In a large-scale cohort study of Trends in International Mathematics and Science Studies (TIMSS)-including data from 58 countries from students in grades 4 and 8 (N = 5501,165)-we examine whether item content that is more likely related to challenges for low-SES students (money, food, social relationships) improves their performance, compared with their average math performance. Results show that low-SES students scored lower on items with this specific content than expected based on an individual's average performance. The effect sizes are substantial: on average, the chance to answer correctly is 18% lower. From a hidden talents approach, these results are unexpected. However, they align with other theoretical frameworks such as scarcity mindset, providing new insights for fair testing.

Citing Articles

Exploring the potential of LLM to enhance teaching plans through teaching simulation.

Hu B, Zhu J, Pei Y, Gu X NPJ Sci Learn. 2025; 10(1):7.

PMID: 39910074 PMC: 11799216. DOI: 10.1038/s41539-025-00300-x.


Using social and behavioral science to address achievement inequality.

Brummelman E, van Atteveldt N, Wolf S, Sierksma J NPJ Sci Learn. 2024; 9(1):44.

PMID: 38987262 PMC: 11237010. DOI: 10.1038/s41539-024-00259-1.


The promise and pitfalls of a strength-based approach to child poverty and neurocognitive development: Implications for policy.

DeJoseph M, Ellwood-Lowe M, Miller-Cotto D, Silverman D, Shannon K, Reyes G Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2024; 66:101375.

PMID: 38608359 PMC: 11019102. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101375.

References
1.
Antonoplis S . Studying Socioeconomic Status: Conceptual Problems and an Alternative Path Forward. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022; 18(2):275-292. PMC: 10018062. DOI: 10.1177/17456916221093615. View

2.
Dubois D, Rucker D, Galinsky A . Social class, power, and selfishness: when and why upper and lower class individuals behave unethically. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015; 108(3):436-49. DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000008. View

3.
Sheehy-Skeffington J . The effects of low socioeconomic status on decision-making processes. Curr Opin Psychol. 2019; 33:183-188. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.043. View

4.
Blair C, Raver C . Child development in the context of adversity: experiential canalization of brain and behavior. Am Psychol. 2012; 67(4):309-18. PMC: 5264526. DOI: 10.1037/a0027493. View

5.
Duncan G, Magnuson K, Votruba-Drzal E . Moving Beyond Correlations in Assessing the Consequences of Poverty. Annu Rev Psychol. 2016; 68:413-434. PMC: 6108837. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044224. View