» Articles » PMID: 38487449

Can Dogs Help Chickens? Pet Owners' Willingness to Pay for Animal Welfare-friendly Pet Food in the United States

Overview
Journal Anim Welf
Date 2024 Mar 15
PMID 38487449
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Consumer concern about farmed animal welfare is growing but does not always translate into real-world purchasing behaviour of welfare-friendly animal products for human consumption. Possible reasons for this include unfamiliarity with farming practices and economic sensitivity. In contrast, the number and role of pets in the United States have grown measurably, and spending on pets is strong. The pet food market has many opportunity niches as pet owners navigate strong marketing trends and nutrition philosophies. We hypothesised that pet owners in the US would be willing to pay a premium for pet food containing welfare-friendly animal ingredients. Eight hundred and thirty-eight pet owners completed an online survey asking questions that measured their knowledge of and interest in farm animal welfare, and their willingness-to-pay for pet food labelled as farm animal welfare-friendly. Respondents overall displayed relatively low knowledge about farm animal welfare, but poor self-assessment of their own knowledge. They displayed interest in farm animal welfare and an overall positive mean willingness-to-pay (WTP) for welfare-friendly pet food. Younger respondents, women and cat owners displayed a higher WTP than older respondents, men and dog owners. Income level was not correlated to WTP. Creating pet food products that contain animal ingredients produced using welfare-friendly practices may enhance farm animal welfare via two primary avenues: by providing a sustainable and value-added outlet for the by-products of welfare-friendly human food products, and by providing an educational opportunity about farm animal production via pet food packaging and other advertising.

Citing Articles

Pet Ownership and Its Influence on Animal Welfare Attitudes and Consumption Intentions Among Chinese University Students.

Liang Y, Meng C, Chen R, Yang Y, Zeng Y Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(22).

PMID: 39595295 PMC: 11591475. DOI: 10.3390/ani14223242.


A Model for Consumer Acceptance of Insect-Based Dog Foods among Adult UK Dog Owners.

Pinney J, Costa-Font M Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(7).

PMID: 38612260 PMC: 11010811. DOI: 10.3390/ani14071021.


Potential demand for National Health Insurance in Zimbabwe: Evidence from selected urban informal sector clusters in Harare.

Chipunza T, Nhamo S PLoS One. 2023; 18(5):e0286374.

PMID: 37253031 PMC: 10228813. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286374.

References
1.
McKendree M, Croney C, Widmar N . Effects of demographic factors and information sources on United States consumer perceptions of animal welfare. J Anim Sci. 2014; 92(7):3161-73. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-6874. View

2.
Dodd S, Cave N, Adolphe J, Shoveller A, Verbrugghe A . Plant-based (vegan) diets for pets: A survey of pet owner attitudes and feeding practices. PLoS One. 2019; 14(1):e0210806. PMC: 6333351. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210806. View

3.
Meeker D, Meisinger J . COMPANION ANIMALS SYMPOSIUM: Rendered ingredients significantly influence sustainability, quality, and safety of pet food. J Anim Sci. 2015; 93(3):835-47. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-8524. View

4.
Elbakidze L, Nayga Jr R . The effects of information on willingness to pay for animal welfare in dairy production: application of nonhypothetical valuation mechanisms. J Dairy Sci. 2012; 95(3):1099-107. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4730. View

5.
Rothgerber H . A meaty matter. Pet diet and the vegetarian's dilemma. Appetite. 2013; 68:76-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.04.012. View