» Articles » PMID: 24962533

Effects of Demographic Factors and Information Sources on United States Consumer Perceptions of Animal Welfare

Overview
Journal J Anim Sci
Date 2014 Jun 26
PMID 24962533
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

As consumers have become more interested in understanding how their food is produced, scrutiny and criticism have increased regarding intensified food animal production methods. Resolution of public concerns about animal agricultural practices depends on understanding the myriad factors that provide the basis for concerns. An online survey of 798 U.S. households was conducted to investigate relationships between household characteristics (demographics, geographic location, and experiences) and level of concern for animal welfare as well as sources used to obtain information on the subject. Because recent media attention has focused on animal care practices used in the U.S. swine industry, respondents were also asked specific questions pertaining to their perceptions of pig management practices and welfare issues and their corresponding pork purchasing behavior. Respondents reporting higher levels of concern about animal welfare were more frequently female, younger, and self-reported members of the Democratic Party. Fourteen percent of respondents reported reduction in pork consumption because of animal welfare concerns with an average reduction of 56%. Over half of the respondents (56%) did not have a primary source for animal welfare information; those who identified a primary information source most commonly used information provided by animal protection organizations, the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA). Midwest participants were significantly, at the 5% significance level, less concerned about domestic livestock animal welfare and more frequently reported not having a source for animal welfare information than those from other regions of the United States. Overall, the U.S. livestock and poultry industries and other organizations affiliated with animal agriculture appear to be less used public sources of information on animal welfare than popular animal protection organizations. Improved understanding of the factors that contribute to consumers' evolving perceptions of the care and welfare of farm animals is an essential step toward enhanced sustainability and social responsibility in contemporary food production systems.

Citing Articles

Public Perceptions of Calf Disbudding Techniques Used on Texas Farms.

Calix A, Lamino P, Rodriguez-Mori H, Garcia A, Artemiou E Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(4).

PMID: 40003034 PMC: 11851945. DOI: 10.3390/ani15040552.


#PorkandPigs: an online media listening analysis of public perception of the U.S. swine industry.

Fisk A, Smith M, Richert B, Olynk Widmar N Transl Anim Sci. 2024; 8:txae155.

PMID: 39660285 PMC: 11630858. DOI: 10.1093/tas/txae155.


From Origins to Trends: A Bibliometric Examination of Ethical Food Consumption.

Beciu S, Arghiroiu G, Bobeica M Foods. 2024; 13(13).

PMID: 38998554 PMC: 11241545. DOI: 10.3390/foods13132048.


Driving Factors Influencing the Decision to Purchase Plant-Based Beverages: A Sample from Türkiye.

Bas M, Kahriman M, Ayakdas G, Hajhamidiasl L, Koseoglu S Foods. 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 38890988 PMC: 11172123. DOI: 10.3390/foods13111760.


Stakeholder Perceptions of Animal Welfare as a Component of Sustainable Beef Programs in the United States-A Pilot Study.

Edwards-Callaway L, Davis M, Dean L, McBride B Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 38731352 PMC: 11083033. DOI: 10.3390/ani14091348.