Ankle Scientific Knowledge and Physiotherapy Practice: A Thematic Analysis of Clinical Behaviors of French-Speaking Physiotherapists

Overview

Journal J Athl Train

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2024 Mar 13

PMID 38477122

Authors

Romain Tourillon

Eamonn Delahunt

Francois Fourchet

Brice Picot

Massamba MBaye

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Context: Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is prevalent among individuals who sustain a lateral ankle sprain (LAS) injury. The persistence of the characteristic long-standing clinical symptoms of CAI may be attributable to the lack of adoption by physiotherapists of evidence-informed clinical guidelines.

Objective: To investigate the extent to which French-speaking physiotherapists implement the International Ankle Consortium rehabilitation-oriented assessment (ROAST) framework when providing clinical care for individuals with an acute LAS injury.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Online survey informed by a Delphi process of foot-ankle experts.

Patients Or Other Participants: A total of 426 French-speaking physiotherapists completed the online survey.

Main Outcome Measure(s): The survey was disseminated to French-speaking physiotherapists in France; Switzerland; Quebec, Canada; Luxembourg; and Belgium. It comprised closed and open-ended questions organized in 5 sections: (1) participant demographics, (2) participant self-assessment of expertise, (3) clinical diagnostic assessment of the ankle (bones and ligaments), (4) clinical evaluation after an acute LAS injury (ROAST framework), and (5) CAI. The qualitative data from the open-ended questions were analyzed using best-practice thematic-analysis guidelines.

Results: Only 6.3% (n = 27) of the respondents could name all Ottawa Ankle Rules criteria. Only 25.6% (n = 109) of the respondents cited or described criterion standard tests from the literature to assess the integrity of the lateral ankle ligaments. Less than 25% (n = 71) of the respondents reported using clinical evaluation outcome metrics (ROAST) recommended by the International Ankle Consortium to inform their clinical care for individuals with an acute LAS injury. In general, the respondents had a greater knowledge of the functional than the mechanical insufficiencies associated with CAI.

Conclusion: A minority of French-speaking physiotherapist survey respondents use the International Ankle Consortium ROAST to inform their clinical care for individuals with an acute LAS injury. This highlights the responsibility of the scientific community to better disseminate evidence-informed research to clinicians.

References

Elo S, Kyngas H . The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008; 62(1):107-15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x. View

Waterman B, Owens B, Davey S, Zacchilli M, Belmont Jr P . The epidemiology of ankle sprains in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92(13):2279-84. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01537. View

Gribble P, Bleakley C, Caulfield B, Docherty C, Fourchet F, Fong D . Evidence review for the 2016 International Ankle Consortium consensus statement on the prevalence, impact and long-term consequences of lateral ankle sprains. Br J Sports Med. 2016; 50(24):1496-1505. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096189. View

McKay G, Goldie P, Payne W, Oakes B . Ankle injuries in basketball: injury rate and risk factors. Br J Sports Med. 2001; 35(2):103-8. PMC: 1724316. DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.35.2.103. View

Curran J, Grimshaw J, Hayden J, Campbell B . Knowledge translation research: the science of moving research into policy and practice. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2011; 31(3):174-80. DOI: 10.1002/chp.20124. View

Hertel J . Functional Anatomy, Pathomechanics, and Pathophysiology of Lateral Ankle Instability. J Athl Train. 2003; 37(4):364-375. PMC: 164367. View

Bossard D, Remus A, Doherty C, Gribble P, Delahunt E . Developing consensus on clinical assessment of acute lateral ankle sprain injuries: protocol for an international and multidisciplinary modified Delphi process. Br J Sports Med. 2018; 52(23):1539. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-099007. View

Fung I . Open access for the non-English-speaking world: overcoming the language barrier. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2008; 5:1. PMC: 2268932. DOI: 10.1186/1742-7622-5-1. View

Ofori-Adjei D, Antes G, Tharyan P, Slade E, Tamber P . Have online international medical journals made local journals obsolete?. PLoS Med. 2006; 3(8):e359. PMC: 5543779. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030359. View

10.

Lin C, Gross M, Weinhold P . Ankle syndesmosis injuries: anatomy, biomechanics, mechanism of injury, and clinical guidelines for diagnosis and intervention. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006; 36(6):372-84. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2006.2195. View

11.

Hiller C, Nightingale E, Raymond J, Kilbreath S, Burns J, Black D . Prevalence and impact of chronic musculoskeletal ankle disorders in the community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93(10):1801-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.04.023. View

12.

Whiteley R, Napier C, van Dyk N, Barton C, Mitchell T, Beales D . Clinicians use courses and conversations to change practice, not journal articles: is it time for journals to peer-review courses to stay relevant?. Br J Sports Med. 2020; 55(12):651-652. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102736. View

13.

Hiller C, Refshauge K, Bundy A, Herbert R, Kilbreath S . The Cumberland ankle instability tool: a report of validity and reliability testing. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87(9):1235-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.022. View

14.

Gribble P . Evaluating and Differentiating Ankle Instability. J Athl Train. 2019; 54(6):617-627. PMC: 6602389. DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-484-17. View

15.

Gribble P, Delahunt E, Bleakley C, Caulfield B, Docherty C, Fourchet F . Selection criteria for patients with chronic ankle instability in controlled research: a position statement of the International Ankle Consortium. Br J Sports Med. 2013; 48(13):1014-8. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093175. View

16.

Borloz S, Crevoisier X, Deriaz O, Ballabeni P, Martin R, Luthi F . Evidence for validity and reliability of a French version of the FAAM. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011; 12:40. PMC: 3045395. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-40. View

17.

Delahunt E, Bleakley C, Bossard D, Caulfield B, Docherty C, Doherty C . Clinical assessment of acute lateral ankle sprain injuries (ROAST): 2019 consensus statement and recommendations of the International Ankle Consortium. Br J Sports Med. 2018; 52(20):1304-1310. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098885. View

18.

Stiell I, Greenberg G, McKnight R, Nair R, McDowell I, REARDON M . Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation. JAMA. 1993; 269(9):1127-32. DOI: 10.1001/jama.269.9.1127. View

19.

Cooke M, Lamb S, Marsh J, Dale J . A survey of current consultant practice of treatment of severe ankle sprains in emergency departments in the United Kingdom. Emerg Med J. 2003; 20(6):505-7. PMC: 1726246. DOI: 10.1136/emj.20.6.505. View

20.

Carcia C, Martin R, Drouin J . Validity of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure in athletes with chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2008; 43(2):179-83. PMC: 2267323. DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.2.179. View