Validity of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure in Athletes with Chronic Ankle Instability

Overview

Journal J Athl Train

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2008 Mar 18

PMID 18345343

Citations 84

Authors

Christopher R Carcia

Robroy L Martin

Joshua M Drouin

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Context: The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) is a region-specific, non-disease-specific outcome instrument that possesses many of the clinimetric qualities recommended for an outcome instrument. Evidence of validity to support the use of the FAAM is available in individuals with a wide array of ankle and foot disorders. However, additional evidence to support the use of the FAAM for those with chronic ankle instability (CAI) is needed.

Objective: To provide evidence of construct validity for the FAAM based on hypothesis testing in athletes with CAI.

Design: Between-groups comparison.

Setting: Athletic training room.

Patients Or Other Participants: Thirty National Collegiate Athletic Association Division II athletes (16 men, 14 women) from one university.

Main Outcome Measure(s): The FAAM including activities of daily living (ADL) and sports subscales and the global and categorical ratings of function.

Results: For both the ADL and sports subscales, FAAM scores were greater in healthy participants (100 +/- 0.0 and 99 +/- 3.5, respectively) than in subjects with CAI (88 +/- 7.7 and 76 +/- 12.7, respectively; P < .001). Similarly, for both ADL and sports subscales, FAAM scores were greater in athletes who indicated that their ankles were normal (98 +/- 6.3 and 96 +/- 6.9, respectively) than in those who classified their ankles as either nearly normal or abnormal (87 +/- 6.6 and 71 +/- 11.1, respectively; P < .001). We found relationships between FAAM scores and self-reported global ratings of function for both ADL and sports subscales. Relationships were stronger when all athletes, rather than just those with CAI, were included in the analyses.

Conclusions: The FAAM may be used to detect self-reported functional deficits related to CAI.

Citing Articles

Postural stability measures as diagnostic tools for chronic ankle instability: a comprehensive assessment.

Piri M, Malmir K, Otadi K, Shadmehr A BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2025; 17(1):16.

PMID: 39885584 PMC: 11784114. DOI: 10.1186/s13102-025-01064-y.

The effects of integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine rehabilitation programs on post-acute ankle sprain: A randomized controlled trial study protocol.

Gao H, Chen X, Ren J, Zhang X, Hu Y, Ma Z PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0318535.

PMID: 39883688 PMC: 11781713. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318535.

Comparison of screw fixation and dynamic fixation in the treatment of ankle fractures with syndesmotic ruptures.

Gungor E, Ercan N, Ovali S, Aydugan M, Cetin H Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024; 30(12):900-906.

PMID: 39668533 PMC: 11849883. DOI: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.20094.

Beyond the needle: How nonsurgical management transforms foot and ankle ability in male footballers with posterior ankle impingement- a longitudinal study.

Gupta J, Rizvi M, Sharma A, Sami W, Fahad A Al-Kuwari N, Hegazy F Heliyon. 2024; 10(23):e40484.

PMID: 39654717 PMC: 11626724. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40484.

The clinical effects of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy for the management of chronic ankle instability: a study protocol for a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Chia C, Fu S, He X, Cheng Y, Franco-Obregon A, Hua Y Trials. 2024; 25(1):808.

PMID: 39627831 PMC: 11613907. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08639-z.

References

Eechaute C, Vaes P, Van Aerschot L, Asman S, Duquet W . The clinimetric qualities of patient-assessed instruments for measuring chronic ankle instability: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007; 8:6. PMC: 1797175. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-6. View

Hintermann B . Biomechanics of the unstable ankle joint and clinical implications. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999; 31(7 Suppl):S459-69. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199907001-00007. View

Martin R, Irrgang J . A survey of self-reported outcome instruments for the foot and ankle. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007; 37(2):72-84. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2007.2403. View

Roos E, Brandsson S, Karlsson J . Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int. 2001; 22(10):788-94. DOI: 10.1177/107110070102201004. View

Martin R, Irrgang J, Burdett R, Conti S, Van Swearingen J . Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Foot Ankle Int. 2005; 26(11):968-83. DOI: 10.1177/107110070502601113. View

Yeung M, Chan K, So C, Yuan W . An epidemiological survey on ankle sprain. Br J Sports Med. 1994; 28(2):112-6. PMC: 1332043. DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.28.2.112. View

Kirshner B, Guyatt G . A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis. 1985; 38(1):27-36. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(85)90005-0. View

Rozzi S, Lephart S, STERNER R, Kuligowski L . Balance training for persons with functionally unstable ankles. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1999; 29(8):478-86. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1999.29.8.478. View

Junge A, Langevoort G, Pipe A, Peytavin A, Wong F, Mountjoy M . Injuries in team sport tournaments during the 2004 Olympic Games. Am J Sports Med. 2005; 34(4):565-76. DOI: 10.1177/0363546505281807. View

10.

Hale S, Hertel J . Reliability and Sensitivity of the Foot and Ankle Disability Index in Subjects With Chronic Ankle Instability. J Athl Train. 2005; 40(1):35-40. PMC: 1088343. View

11.

Anandacoomarasamy A, Barnsley L . Long term outcomes of inversion ankle injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2005; 39(3):e14. PMC: 1725165. DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.011676. View

12.

Docherty C, Gansneder B, Arnold B, Hurwitz S . Development and reliability of the ankle instability instrument. J Athl Train. 2006; 41(2):154-8. PMC: 1472648. View

13.

Hiller C, Refshauge K, Bundy A, Herbert R, Kilbreath S . The Cumberland ankle instability tool: a report of validity and reliability testing. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87(9):1235-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.022. View

14.

Refshauge K, Kilbreath S, Raymond J . The effect of recurrent ankle inversion sprain and taping on proprioception at the ankle. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000; 32(1):10-5. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200001000-00003. View

15.

Martin R, Irrgang J, Lalonde K, Conti S . Current concepts review: foot and ankle outcome instruments. Foot Ankle Int. 2006; 27(5):383-90. DOI: 10.1177/107110070602700514. View

16.

Freeman M . Instability of the foot after injuries to the lateral ligament of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1965; 47(4):669-77. View