» Articles » PMID: 38476769

SPINK1 is a Potential Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker for Sepsis

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Date 2024 Mar 13
PMID 38476769
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: There are no satisfactory diagnostic biomarkers for sepsis. Accordingly, this study screened biomarkers valuable for sepsis diagnosis and prognosis using data-independent acquisition (DIA) combined with clinical data analysis.

Patients And Methods: Serine protease inhibitor Kazal-type 1 (SPINK1) is a differentially expressed protein that was screened using DIA and bioinformatics in sepsis patients (n = 22) and healthy controls (n = 10). The plasma SPINK1 levels were detected using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in an expanded population (sepsis patients, n = 52; healthy controls, n = 10). The diagnostic value of SPINK1 in sepsis was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis based on clinical data. The prognostic value of SPINK1 for sepsis was evaluated using correlation and survival analyses.

Results: DIA quality control identified 78 differential proteins (72 upregulated and six downregulated), among which SPINK1 was highly expressed in sepsis. The ELISA results suggested that SPINK1 expression was significantly elevated in the sepsis group (P < 0.05). ROC analysis of SPINK1 yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9096. Combining SPINK1 with procalcitonin (PCT) for ROC analysis yielded an AUC of 1. SPINK1 expression was positively correlated with the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (r = 3497, P = 0.0053) and APACHE II score (r = 3223, P = 0.0106). High plasma SPINK1 protein expression was negatively correlated with the 28-day survival rate of patients with sepsis (P = 0.0149).

Conclusion: The plasma of sepsis patients contained increased SPINK1 protein expression. Combining SPINK1 with PCT might have a high diagnostic value for sepsis. SPINK1 was associated with the SOFA score, APACHE II score, and the 28-day survival rate in patients with sepsis.

References
1.
Povoa P, Coelho L, Dal-Pizzol F, Ferrer R, Huttner A, Morris A . How to use biomarkers of infection or sepsis at the bedside: guide to clinicians. Intensive Care Med. 2023; 49(2):142-153. PMC: 9807102. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-022-06956-y. View

2.
El-Khazragy N, Mohamed N, Mostafa M, Elnakib M, Hemida E, Salah A . miRNAs: novel noninvasive biomarkers as diagnostic and prognostic tools in neonatal sepsis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2023; 107(3):116053. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2023.116053. View

3.
Essmann L, Wirz Y, Gregoriano C, Schuetz P . One biomarker does not fit all: tailoring anti-infective therapy through utilization of procalcitonin and other specific biomarkers. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2023; 23(9):739-752. DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2023.2242782. View

4.
Ruopp M, Perkins N, Whitcomb B, Schisterman E . Youden Index and optimal cut-point estimated from observations affected by a lower limit of detection. Biom J. 2008; 50(3):419-30. PMC: 2515362. DOI: 10.1002/bimj.200710415. View

5.
Knaus W, Draper E, Wagner D, Zimmerman J . APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985; 13(10):818-29. View