» Articles » PMID: 38475592

A Comparative Analysis of XGBoost and Neural Network Models for Predicting Some Tomato Fruit Quality Traits from Environmental and Meteorological Data

Overview
Journal Plants (Basel)
Date 2024 Mar 13
PMID 38475592
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The tomato as a raw material for processing is globally important and is pivotal in dietary and agronomic research due to its nutritional, economic, and health significance. This study explored the potential of machine learning (ML) for predicting tomato quality, utilizing data from 48 cultivars and 28 locations in Hungary over 5 seasons. It focused on °Brix, lycopene content, and colour (a/b ratio) using extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and artificial neural network (ANN) models. The results revealed that XGBoost consistently outperformed ANN, achieving high accuracy in predicting °Brix (R² = 0.98, RMSE = 0.07) and lycopene content (R² = 0.87, RMSE = 0.61), and excelling in colour prediction (a/b ratio) with a R² of 0.93 and RMSE of 0.03. ANN lagged behind particularly in colour prediction, showing a negative R² value of -0.35. Shapley additive explanation's (SHAP) summary plot analysis indicated that both models are effective in predicting °Brix and lycopene content in tomatoes, highlighting different aspects of the data. SHAP analysis highlighted the models' efficiency (especially in °Brix and lycopene predictions) and underscored the significant influence of cultivar choice and environmental factors like climate and soil. These findings emphasize the importance of selecting and fine-tuning the appropriate ML model for enhancing precision agriculture, underlining XGBoost's superiority in handling complex agronomic data for quality assessment.

References
1.
Egei M, Takacs S, Palotas G, Palotas G, Szuvandzsiev P, Daood H . Prediction of Soluble Solids and Lycopene Content of Processing Tomato Cultivars by Vis-NIR Spectroscopy. Front Nutr. 2022; 9:845317. PMC: 9274195. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.845317. View

2.
Ahanger M, Akram N, Ashraf M, Alyemeni M, Wijaya L, Ahmad P . Plant responses to environmental stresses-from gene to biotechnology. AoB Plants. 2017; 9(4):plx025. PMC: 5534019. DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plx025. View

3.
Shahid N . Comparison of hierarchical clustering and neural network clustering: an analysis on precision dominance. Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):5661. PMC: 10079863. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-32790-3. View

4.
Chowdhury R, Eti F, Ahmed R, Gupta S, Jhan P, Islam T . Drought-responsive genes in tomato: meta-analysis of gene expression using machine learning. Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):19374. PMC: 10632472. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45942-2. View

5.
Nketiah E, Chenlong L, Yingchuan J, Aram S . Recurrent neural network modeling of multivariate time series and its application in temperature forecasting. PLoS One. 2023; 18(5):e0285713. PMC: 10198567. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285713. View