» Articles » PMID: 37938584

Drought-responsive Genes in Tomato: Meta-analysis of Gene Expression Using Machine Learning

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2023 Nov 8
PMID 37938584
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Plants have diverse molecular mechanisms to protect themselves from biotic and abiotic stressors and adapt to changing environments. To uncover the genetic potential of plants, it is crucial to understand how they adapt to adverse conditions by analyzing their genomic data. We analyzed RNA-Seq data from different tomato genotypes, tissue types, and drought durations. We used a time series scale to identify early and late drought-responsive gene modules and applied a machine learning method to identify the best responsive genes to drought. We demonstrated six candidate genes of tomato viz. Fasciclin-like arabinogalactan protein 2 (FLA2), Amino acid transporter family protein (ASCT), Arginine decarboxylase 1 (ADC1), Protein NRT1/PTR family 7.3 (NPF7.3), BAG family molecular chaperone regulator 5 (BAG5) and Dicer-like 2b (DCL2b) were responsive to drought. We constructed gene association networks to identify their potential interactors and found them drought-responsive. The identified candidate genes can help to explore the adaptation of tomato plants to drought. Furthermore, these candidate genes can have far-reaching implications for molecular breeding and genome editing in tomatoes, providing insights into the molecular mechanisms that underlie drought adaptation. This research underscores the importance of the genetic basis of plant adaptation, particularly in changing climates and growing populations.

Citing Articles

Exploring the Genetic Basis of Drought Tolerance in : A Comprehensive Transcriptome Study of Osmotic Stress Adaptations.

Tang G, Li X, Zeng F, Ma J, Guan P, Zhang B Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(23).

PMID: 39684437 PMC: 11641545. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252312725.


Dissection of major QTLs and candidate genes for seedling stage salt/drought tolerance in tomato.

Li X, Liu X, Pan F, Hu J, Han Y, Bi R BMC Genomics. 2024; 25(1):1170.

PMID: 39627739 PMC: 11613539. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-11101-8.


Endophytic Colonization of Enhances Drought Stress Tolerance in Tomato via "Water Spender" Pathway.

Guo W, Lu Y, Du S, Li Q, Zou X, Zhang Z Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(22).

PMID: 39596021 PMC: 11594164. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252211949.


Recent advances in exploring transcriptional regulatory landscape of crops.

Huo Q, Song R, Ma Z Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1421503.

PMID: 38903438 PMC: 11188431. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1421503.


A Comparative Analysis of XGBoost and Neural Network Models for Predicting Some Tomato Fruit Quality Traits from Environmental and Meteorological Data.

MHamdi O, Takacs S, Palotas G, Ilahy R, Helyes L, Pek Z Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38475592 PMC: 10934895. DOI: 10.3390/plants13050746.

References
1.
Biehler K, Fock H . Evidence for the Contribution of the Mehler-Peroxidase Reaction in Dissipating Excess Electrons in Drought-Stressed Wheat. Plant Physiol. 1996; 112(1):265-272. PMC: 157945. DOI: 10.1104/pp.112.1.265. View

2.
Diouf I, Derivot L, Bitton F, Pascual L, Causse M . Water Deficit and Salinity Stress Reveal Many Specific QTL for Plant Growth and Fruit Quality Traits in Tomato. Front Plant Sci. 2018; 9:279. PMC: 5845638. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00279. View

3.
Osakabe Y, Osakabe K, Shinozaki K, Tran L . Response of plants to water stress. Front Plant Sci. 2014; 5:86. PMC: 3952189. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00086. View

4.
Lopez-Galiano M, Garcia-Robles I, Gonzalez-Hernandez A, Camanes G, Vicedo B, Real M . Expression of miR159 Is Altered in Tomato Plants Undergoing Drought Stress. Plants (Basel). 2019; 8(7). PMC: 6681330. DOI: 10.3390/plants8070201. View

5.
Cheng C, Li Y, Varala K, Bubert J, Huang J, Kim G . Evolutionarily informed machine learning enhances the power of predictive gene-to-phenotype relationships. Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1):5627. PMC: 8463701. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25893-w. View