Live Birth Outcomes Following Single-step Blastocyst Warming Technique - Optimizing Efficiency Without Impacting Live Birth Rates

Overview

Journal J Assist Reprod Genet

Publisher Springer

Specialties Genetics
Reproductive Medicine

Date 2024 Mar 13

PMID 38472563

Authors

Victoria S Jiang

Panagiotis Cherouveim

Mackenzie N Naert

Irene Dimitriadis

Irene Souter

Charles L Bormann

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of a single-step (SS) warming versus standard warming (SW) protocol on the survival/expansion of vitrified blastocysts and their clinical outcomes post-frozen embryo transfer (FET).

Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on 200 vitrified/warmed research blastocysts equally divided amongst two thawing protocols utilizing the Fujifilm Warming NX kits (Fujifilm, CA). SW utilized the standard 14-minute manufacturer's guidelines. SS protocol required only a one-minute immersion in thaw solution (TS) before the embryos were transferred to culture media. A time-interrupted study was performed evaluating 752 FETs (SW: 376 FETs, SS 376 FETs) between April 2021-December 2022 at a single academic fertility clinic in Boston, Massachusetts. Embryologic, clinical pregnancy, and live birth outcomes were assessed using generalized estimated equation (GEE) models, which accounted for potential confounders.

Results: There was 100% survival for all blastocysts (n = 952 embryos) with no differences in blastocyst re-expansion regardless of PGT status. Adjusted analysis showed no differences in implantation, clinical pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, or biochemical pregnancy rate. A higher odds of multiple gestation [AdjOR(95%CI) 1.06 (1.01, 1.11), p = 0.019] were noted, even when adjusting for number of embryos transferred [AdjOR(95%CI) 1.05 (1.01, 1.10)]. Live birth outcomes showed no differences in live birth rates or birthweight at delivery.

Conclusions: The study found equivalent outcomes for SS and SW in all parameters except for a slight rise in the rate of multiple gestations. The results suggest that SS warming is an efficient, viable alternative to SW, reducing thaw times without adverse effects on live birth rates or neonatal birth weights.

Citing Articles

The nexus between gamete donation and cryobiology in ARTs: Avoiding the unavoidable.

Albertini D J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(11):2853-2854.

PMID: 39589682 PMC: 11621282. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03331-2.

The new ice age: the promise and challenges of rapid oocyte warming protocols.

Bartolacci A, Albertini D J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(11):2969-2971.

PMID: 39556268 PMC: 11621260. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03315-2.

References

Parmegiani L, Tatone C, Cognigni G, Bernardi S, Troilo E, Arnone A . Rapid warming increases survival of slow-frozen sibling oocytes: a step towards a single warming procedure irrespective of the freezing protocol?. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014; 28(5):614-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.01.015. View

Vajta G, Nagy Z . Are programmable freezers still needed in the embryo laboratory? Review on vitrification. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006; 12(6):779-96. DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61091-7. View

Canosa S, Parmegiani L, Charrier L, Gennarelli G, Garello C, Granella F . Are commercial warming kits interchangeable for vitrified human blastocysts? Further evidence for the adoption of a Universal Warming protocol. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021; 39(1):67-73. PMC: 8866604. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02364-1. View

Nagy Z, Shapiro D, Chang C . Vitrification of the human embryo: a more efficient and safer in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertil Steril. 2020; 113(2):241-247. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.12.009. View

Serdarogullari M, Coban O, Boynukalin F, Bilgin E, Findikli N, Bahceci M . Successful application of a single warming protocol for embryos cryopreserved by either slow freezing or vitrification techniques. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2018; 65(1):12-19. DOI: 10.1080/19396368.2018.1487477. View

Cimadomo D, Capalbo A, Levi-Setti P, Soscia D, Orlando G, Albani E . Associations of blastocyst features, trophectoderm biopsy and other laboratory practice with post-warming behavior and implantation. Hum Reprod. 2018; 33(11):1992-2001. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey291. View

Li Z, Wang Y, Ledger W, Edgar D, Sullivan E . Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2014; 29(12):2794-801. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu246. View

Hershko-Klement A, Raviv S, Nemerovsky L, Rom T, Itskovich A, Bakhshi D . Standardization of Post-Vitrification Human Blastocyst Expansion as a Tool for Implantation Prediction. J Clin Med. 2022; 11(9). PMC: 9101782. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11092673. View

Roy T, Bradley C, Bowman M, McArthur S . Single-embryo transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts yields equivalent live-birth rates and improved neonatal outcomes compared with fresh transfers. Fertil Steril. 2014; 101(5):1294-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.046. View

10.

Parmegiani L, Beilby K, Arnone A, Bernardi S, Maccarini A, Nardi E . Testing the efficacy and efficiency of a single "universal warming protocol" for vitrified human embryos: prospective randomized controlled trial and retrospective longitudinal cohort study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018; 35(10):1887-1895. PMC: 6150888. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-018-1276-4. View

11.

Parmegiani L, Minasi M, Arnone A, Casciani V, Cognigni G, Vinoles R . "Universal Warming" protocol for vitrified oocytes to streamline cell exchange for transnational donation programs: a multi-center study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020; 37(6):1379-1385. PMC: 7311616. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01798-3. View

12.

Shu Y, Watt J, Gebhardt J, Dasig J, Appling J, Behr B . The value of fast blastocoele re-expansion in the selection of a viable thawed blastocyst for transfer. Fertil Steril. 2008; 91(2):401-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.083. View

13.

Zaat T, Zagers M, Mol F, Goddijn M, van Wely M, Mastenbroek S . Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 2:CD011184. PMC: 8095009. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011184.pub3. View

14.

Du Q, Wang E, Huang Y, Guo X, Xiong Y, Yu Y . Blastocoele expansion degree predicts live birth after single blastocyst transfer for fresh and vitrified/warmed single blastocyst transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2016; 105(4):910-919.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.014. View

15.

Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, LaBarbera A, Kaser D, Ubaldi F . Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 2016; 23(2):139-155. PMC: 5850862. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmw038. View