» Articles » PMID: 35566799

Standardization of Post-Vitrification Human Blastocyst Expansion As a Tool for Implantation Prediction

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 May 14
PMID 35566799
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The increased use of vitrified blastocysts has encouraged the development of various criteria for selecting the embryo most likely to implant. Post-thaw assessment methods and timetables vary among investigators. We investigated the predictive value of well-defined measurements of human blastocyst re-expansion, following a fixed incubation period. Post-thaw measurements were taken exactly at 0 and 120 ± 15 min. Minimum and maximum cross-sectional axes were measured. Three groups were defined: Group 1: embryos that continued to shrink by 10 µm or more; group 2: embryos that ranged from -9 to +9 µm; and group 3: re-expansion of 10 µm or more. Patient and morphokinetic data were collected and integrated into the analysis. A total of 115 cases were included. The clinical pregnancy rate for group 1 was 18.9%; group 2, 27%; and group 3, 51.2% ( = 0.007). Pre-thaw morphologic grading and morphokinetic scores of the study groups did not reveal differences. -values were 0.17 for the pre-thaw morphologic score, 0.54 for KID3, and 0.37 for KID5. The patients' demographic and clinical data were similar. The clinical pregnancy rate correlated with the degree of thawed blastocyst re-expansion measured 2 h after incubation. This standardized measure is suggested as a tool to predict the potential of treatment success before embryo transfer.

Citing Articles

Live birth outcomes following single-step blastocyst warming technique - optimizing efficiency without impacting live birth rates.

Jiang V, Cherouveim P, N Naert M, Dimitriadis I, Souter I, Bormann C J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(5):1193-1202.

PMID: 38472563 PMC: 11143112. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03069-x.


Pre-Vitrification and Post-Warming Variables of Vitrified-Warmed Blastocysts That Are Predictable for Implantation.

Gabrielsen A, Iversen L, Fedder J, Eskildsen T, Englund A, Hansen S J Clin Med. 2023; 12(19).

PMID: 37835035 PMC: 10573500. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12196389.


Clinical Usability of Embryo Development Using a Combined Qualitative and Quantitative Approach in a Single Vitrified-Warmed Blastocyst Transfer: Assessment of Pre-Vitrified Blastocyst Diameter and Post-Warmed Blastocyst Re-Expansion Speed.

Park J, Ahn S, Seok S, Park S, Bang S, Eum J J Clin Med. 2022; 11(23).

PMID: 36498659 PMC: 9736480. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11237085.

References
1.
Ahlstrom A, Westin C, Wikland M, Hardarson T . Prediction of live birth in frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer cycles by pre-freeze and post-thaw morphology. Hum Reprod. 2013; 28(5):1199-209. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det054. View

2.
Coello A, Meseguer M, Galan A, Alegre L, Remohi J, Cobo A . Analysis of the morphological dynamics of blastocysts after vitrification/warming: defining new predictive variables of implantation. Fertil Steril. 2017; 108(4):659-666.e4. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.07.1157. View

3.
Petersen B, Boel M, Montag M, Gardner D . Development of a generally applicable morphokinetic algorithm capable of predicting the implantation potential of embryos transferred on Day 3. Hum Reprod. 2016; 31(10):2231-44. PMC: 5027927. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew188. View

4.
Cimadomo D, Capalbo A, Levi-Setti P, Soscia D, Orlando G, Albani E . Associations of blastocyst features, trophectoderm biopsy and other laboratory practice with post-warming behavior and implantation. Hum Reprod. 2018; 33(11):1992-2001. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey291. View

5.
Reignier A, Girard J, Lammers J, Chtourou S, Lefebvre T, Barriere P . Performance of Day 5 KIDScore™ morphokinetic prediction models of implantation and live birth after single blastocyst transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019; 36(11):2279-2285. PMC: 6885460. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01567-x. View