» Articles » PMID: 38468804

Genus on the Edge of the Continental U.S.: Flight Phenology, Analysis of Hybrid Presence, and Insecticide Performance in High-input Field Crops in Puerto Rico

Overview
Date 2024 Mar 12
PMID 38468804
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The genus includes several agricultural pests globally. was reported in several countries in South America in 2013, and in Puerto Rico, in 2014. This territory is considered an agricultural hub, with a high-input system of seed production in the southern region of the island, and also at the edge of the continental U.S. Possible natural dispersion of populations of from the Caribbean or other Central American regions poses a continuing risk to the U.S. This study was performed during the post-detection scenario of in Puerto Rico, from 2018 to 2021. A year-round pheromone trapping program of adult males indicated an increase in the population from October to March and differences in the occurrence of spp. between the municipalities Juan Diaz and Salinas. The proportion of / and detection of congeneric hybrids between these species were assessed based on genital morphology and DNA analysis. Interestingly, neither nor expected hybrids were detected in the present study. The susceptibility of populations to the insecticides Spinetoram, Emamectin benzoate, Chlorantraniliprole, and Esfenvalerate was assessed, and an overall significant effect of insecticide susceptibility was detected. Chlorantraniliprole and Emamectin benzoate had the highest efficacy. These results contribute to the Integrated Pest Management and Insect resistance management programs to spp. in Puerto Rico. In addition, provide validated information to be considered in mitigation plans, in the scenario of an invasion of in the continental U.S.

Citing Articles

Accurate identification of hybrids using genome admixture analysis: implications for genomic surveillance.

Trujillo D, Mastrangelo T, Estevez de Jensen C, Verle Rodrigues J, Lawrie R, Massey S Front Insect Sci. 2024; 4:1339143.

PMID: 38469344 PMC: 10926370. DOI: 10.3389/finsc.2024.1339143.

References
1.
Kriticos D, Ota N, Hutchison W, Beddow J, Walsh T, Tay W . The potential distribution of invading Helicoverpa armigera in North America: is it just a matter of time?. PLoS One. 2015; 10(3):e0119618. PMC: 4364701. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119618. View

2.
Luttrell R, Jackson R . Helicoverpa zea and Bt cotton in the United States. GM Crops Food. 2012; 3(3):213-27. DOI: 10.4161/gmcr.20742. View

3.
Lahm G, Selby T, Freudenberger J, Stevenson T, Myers B, Seburyamo G . Insecticidal anthranilic diamides: a new class of potent ryanodine receptor activators. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2005; 15(22):4898-906. DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.08.034. View

4.
Leite N, Alves-Pereira A, Correa A, Zucchi M, Omoto C . Demographics and genetic variability of the new world bollworm (Helicoverpa zea) and the old world bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera) in Brazil. PLoS One. 2014; 9(11):e113286. PMC: 4237417. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113286. View

5.
Gilligan T, Goldstein P, Timm A, Farris R, Ledezma L, Cunningham A . Identification of Heliothine (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Larvae Intercepted at U.S. Ports of Entry From the New World. J Econ Entomol. 2019; 112(2):603-615. DOI: 10.1093/jee/toy402. View