Dissimilarities of Neural Representations of Extinction Trials Are Associated with Extinction Learning Performance and Renewal Level

Overview

Journal Front Behav Neurosci

Specialty Psychology

Date 2024 Mar 12

PMID 38468709

Authors

Silke Lissek

Martin Tegenthoff

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Renewal of extinguished responses is associated with higher activity in specific extinction-relevant brain regions, i.e., hippocampus (HC), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and ventromedial PFC (vmPFC). HC is involved in processing of context information, while IFG and vmPFC use such context information for selecting and deciding among competing response options. However, it is as yet unknown to what extent trials with changed versus unchanged outcome, or extinction trials that evoke renewal (i.e., extinction context differs from acquisition and test context: ABA trials) and trials that do not (i.e., same context in all phases: AAA trials) are represented differentially in extinction-relevant brain regions.

Methods: In this study, we applied representational similarity analysis (RSA) to determine differences in neural representations of these trial types and their relationship to extinction error rates and renewal level.

Results: Overall, individuals with renewal (REN) and those without (NoREN) did not differ significantly in their discrimination levels between ABA and AAA extinction trials, with the exception of right posterior HC, where REN exhibited more pronounced context-related discrimination. In addition, higher dissimilarity of representations in bilateral posterior HC, as well as in several IFG regions, during extinction learning was linked to lower ABA renewal rates. Both REN and NoREN benefitted from prediction error feedback from ABA extinction errors for context- and outcome-related discrimination of trials in IFG, vmPFC, and HC, but only the NoREN group also benefitted from error feedback from AAA extinction errors.

Discussion: Thus, while in both groups the presence of a novel context supported formation of distinct representations, only in NoREN the expectancy violation of the surprising change of outcome alone had a similar effect. In addition, only in NoREN context-related discrimination was linked to error feedback in vmPFC. In summary, the findings show that context- and outcome-related discrimination of trials in HC, vmPFC, and IFG is linked to extinction learning errors, regardless of renewal propensity, and at the same time point towards differential context processing strategies in REN and NoREN. Moreover, better discrimination of context-related trials during extinction learning promotes less renewal during extinction recall, suggesting that renewal may be related to suboptimal context-related trial discrimination.

References

Lissek S, Glaubitz B, Gunturkun O, Tegenthoff M . Noradrenergic stimulation modulates activation of extinction-related brain regions and enhances contextual extinction learning without affecting renewal. Front Behav Neurosci. 2015; 9:34. PMC: 4333811. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00034. View

Mitchell D, Luo Q, Avny S, Kasprzycki T, Gupta K, Chen G . Adapting to dynamic stimulus-response values: differential contributions of inferior frontal, dorsomedial, and dorsolateral regions of prefrontal cortex to decision making. J Neurosci. 2009; 29(35):10827-34. PMC: 2774778. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0963-09.2009. View

Budhani S, Marsh A, Pine D, Blair R . Neural correlates of response reversal: considering acquisition. Neuroimage. 2006; 34(4):1754-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.060. View

Kumaran D, Maguire E . Novelty signals: a window into hippocampal information processing. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009; 13(2):47-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.004. View

Lissek S, Glaubitz B, Wolf O, Tegenthoff M . The DA antagonist tiapride impairs context-related extinction learning in a novel context without affecting renewal. Front Behav Neurosci. 2015; 9:238. PMC: 4558976. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00238. View

Kalisch R, Korenfeld E, Stephan K, Weiskopf N, Seymour B, Dolan R . Context-dependent human extinction memory is mediated by a ventromedial prefrontal and hippocampal network. J Neurosci. 2006; 26(37):9503-11. PMC: 2634865. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2021-06.2006. View

Swick D, Ashley V, Turken A . Left inferior frontal gyrus is critical for response inhibition. BMC Neurosci. 2008; 9:102. PMC: 2588614. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-9-102. View

Graner J, Stjepanovic D, LaBar K . Extinction learning alters the neural representation of conditioned fear. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020; 20(5):983-997. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-020-00814-4. View

Rolls E . The hippocampus, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and episodic and semantic memory. Prog Neurobiol. 2022; 217:102334. DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2022.102334. View

10.

Kumaran D, Maguire E . An unexpected sequence of events: mismatch detection in the human hippocampus. PLoS Biol. 2006; 4(12):e424. PMC: 1661685. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040424. View

11.

Klass A, Otto T, Tegenthoff M, Lissek S . The DA-antagonist Tiapride affects context-related extinction learning in a predictive learning task, but not initial forming of associations, or renewal. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2021; 183:107465. DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2021.107465. View

12.

Novick J, Trueswell J, Thompson-Schill S . Cognitive control and parsing: reexamining the role of Broca's area in sentence comprehension. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2006; 5(3):263-81. DOI: 10.3758/cabn.5.3.263. View

13.

Nili H, Wingfield C, Walther A, Su L, Marslen-Wilson W, Kriegeskorte N . A toolbox for representational similarity analysis. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014; 10(4):e1003553. PMC: 3990488. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003553. View

14.

Konishi S, Nakajima K, Uchida I, Kikyo H, Kameyama M, Miyashita Y . Common inhibitory mechanism in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by event-related functional MRI. Brain. 1999; 122 ( Pt 5):981-91. DOI: 10.1093/brain/122.5.981. View

15.

Kriegeskorte N, Mur M, Bandettini P . Representational similarity analysis - connecting the branches of systems neuroscience. Front Syst Neurosci. 2008; 2:4. PMC: 2605405. DOI: 10.3389/neuro.06.004.2008. View

16.

Uengoer M, Klass A, Tegenthoff M, Lissek S . Test-retest reliability of response recovery after discrimination reversal learning. Behav Processes. 2020; 176:104107. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104107. View

17.

Frank L, Bowman C, Zeithamova D . Differential Functional Connectivity along the Long Axis of the Hippocampus Aligns with Differential Role in Memory Specificity and Generalization. J Cogn Neurosci. 2019; 31(12):1958-1975. PMC: 8080992. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01457. View

18.

Ungor M, Lachnit H . Contextual control in discrimination reversal learning. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006; 32(4):441-53. DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.32.4.441. View

19.

Hampshire A, Chamberlain S, Monti M, Duncan J, Owen A . The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: inhibition and attentional control. Neuroimage. 2010; 50(3):1313-9. PMC: 2845804. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.109. View

20.

Lissek S, Klass A, Tegenthoff M . Effects of Noradrenergic Stimulation Upon Context-Related Extinction Learning Performance and BOLD Activation in Hippocampus and Prefrontal Cortex Differ Between Participants Showing and Not Showing Renewal. Front Behav Neurosci. 2019; 13:78. PMC: 6491890. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00078. View