» Articles » PMID: 38463940

Prognostic Value of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy: a VALOR® Study

Abstract

Introduction: Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) serves as a method to estimate body composition. Parameters such as phase angle (PA), standardized phase angle (SPA), body mass cell (BCM), BCM index (BCMI), and fat-free mass (FFM) might significantly impact the prognosis of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. The present study aimed to investigate whether bioelectrical parameters can be used to predict survival in the HNC population and establish the optimal cutoff points for predictive accuracy.

Methods: A multicenter observational study was performed across 12 tertiary hospitals in Andalusia (a region from the south of Spain). A total of 494 patients diagnosed with HNC between 2020 and 2022 at different stages were included in this study, with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. The BIA assessment was carried out during the first 2 weeks of radical radiotherapy treatment with chemotherapy or other systemic treatments. A multivariate logistic regression analysis of overall survival, complications, hospital admission, and palliative care and its relationship with BIA nutritional assessment was performed.

Results: Significant prognostic factors identified in the multivariable analysis encompassed phase angle (PA), standardized phase angle (SPA), body cell mass (BCM), and BCM index (BCMI). Lower PA and BCM values were significantly associated with adverse clinical outcomes. A BCM threshold above 17 kg/m was the most significant predictor for predicting survival within the overall HNC population. The PA values of <5.1° in male and <4.8° in female patients showed the best predictive potential for mortality. Increased PA (as a continuous variable) demonstrated a significantly reduced risk for mortality (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.94;  < 0.05) and a decreased likelihood of hospital admission (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.52-1.07;  < 0.05). Higher BCM correlated with a lower risk of mortality (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.96;  < 0.01) and a diminished probability of hospital admission (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.83-0.99;  < 0.05).

Conclusion: BIA is a crucial tool in the nutritional assessment of HNC patients. BCM and PA are the main bioelectrical parameters used to predict clinical outcomes in this population. Future studies are needed to validate BIA variables in a large cohort to ensure whether early intensification of nutritional treatment would improve survival.

Citing Articles

Dynamic Nutrition Strategies for Anorexia Nervosa: Marker-Based Integration of Calories and Proteins.

Dozio E, Alonge M, Tori G, Caumo A, Russo R, Scuttari E Nutrients. 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39940418 PMC: 11820861. DOI: 10.3390/nu17030560.


Predictive Factors of the Degrees of Malnutrition According to GLIM Criteria in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: Valor Group.

Vilchez-Lopez F, Gonzalez-Pacheco M, Fernandez-Jimenez R, Zarco-Martin M, Gonzalo-Marin M, Cobo-Molinos J Cancers (Basel). 2025; 16(24.

PMID: 39766154 PMC: 11674739. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16244255.


Rectus femoris cross sectional area and timed up and go test potential useful of as a predictor of sarcopenia and mortality in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Fernandez-Jimenez R, Cabrera-Cesar E, Sanmartin-Sanchez A, Sanchez-Garcia A, Espildora-Hernandez F, Vegas-Aguilar I Front Nutr. 2024; 11:1440402.

PMID: 39698245 PMC: 11652176. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1440402.


Multiparametric Approach to the Colorectal Cancer Phenotypes Integrating Morphofunctional Assessment and Computer Tomography.

Guirado-Pelaez P, Fernandez-Jimenez R, Sanchez-Torralvo F, Mucarzel Suarez-Arana F, Palmas-Candia F, Vegas-Aguilar I Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(20).

PMID: 39456587 PMC: 11506564. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16203493.


Improving the nutritional evaluation in head neck cancer patients using bioelectrical impedance analysis: Not only the phase angle matters.

Herrera-Martinez A, Prior-Sanchez I, Fernandez-Soto M, Garcia-Olivares M, Novo-Rodriguez C, Gonzalez-Pacheco M J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2024; 15(6):2426-2436.

PMID: 39447215 PMC: 11634526. DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.13577.


References
1.
Buntzel J, Micke O, Kisters K, Buntzel J, Mucke R . Malnutrition and Survival - Bioimpedance Data in Head Neck Cancer Patients. In Vivo. 2019; 33(3):979-982. PMC: 6559905. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11567. View

2.
van Rijn-Dekker M, Van den Bosch L, van den Hoek J, Bijl H, van Aken E, van der Hoorn A . Impact of sarcopenia on survival and late toxicity in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2020; 147:103-110. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.03.014. View

3.
Jiang N, Zhang J, Cheng S, Liang B . The Role of Standardized Phase Angle in the Assessment of Nutritional Status and Clinical Outcomes in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Nutrients. 2023; 15(1). PMC: 9824322. DOI: 10.3390/nu15010050. View

4.
do Amaral Paes T, de Oliveira K, de Carvalho Padilha P, Arantes Ferreira Peres W . Phase angle assessment in critically ill cancer patients: Relationship with the nutritional status, prognostic factors and death. J Crit Care. 2018; 44:430-435. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.01.006. View

5.
Gonzalez-Barba F, Balderas-Pena L, Trujillo-Hernandez B, Cervantes-Gonzalez L, Gonzalez-Rodriguez J, Gutierrez-Rodriguez L . Phase Angle and Nutritional Status: The Impact on Survival and Health-Related Quality of Life in Locally Advanced Uterine Cervical Cancer. Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(2). PMC: 9859032. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11020246. View