» Articles » PMID: 38461177

GWAS Reveals Determinants of Mobilization Rate and Dynamics of an Active Endogenous Retrovirus of Cattle

Abstract

Five to ten percent of mammalian genomes is occupied by multiple clades of endogenous retroviruses (ERVs), that may count thousands of members. New ERV clades arise by retroviral infection of the germline followed by expansion by reinfection and/or retrotransposition. ERV mobilization is a source of deleterious variation, driving the emergence of ERV silencing mechanisms, leaving "DNA fossils". Here we show that the ERVK[2-1-LTR] clade is still active in the bovine and a source of disease-causing alleles. We develop a method to measure the rate of ERVK[2-1-LTR] mobilization, finding an average of 1 per ~150 sperm cells, with >10-fold difference between animals. We perform a genome-wide association study and identify eight loci affecting ERVK[2-1-LTR] mobilization. We provide evidence that polymorphic ERVK[2-1-LTR] elements in four of these loci cause the association. We generate a catalogue of full length ERVK[2-1-LTR] elements, and show that it comprises 15% of C-type autonomous elements, and 85% of D-type non-autonomous elements lacking functional genes. We show that >25% of the variance of mobilization rate is determined by the number of C-type elements, yet that de novo insertions are dominated by D-type elements. We propose that D-type elements act as parasite-of-parasite gene drives that may contribute to the observed demise of ERV elements.

Citing Articles

A genome-wide study of ruminants uncovers two endogenous retrovirus families recently active in goats.

Verneret M, Leroux C, Faraut T, Navratil V, Lerat E, Turpin J Mob DNA. 2025; 16(1):4.

PMID: 39962507 PMC: 11831830. DOI: 10.1186/s13100-024-00337-6.


Transcription of Endogenous Retroviruses: Broad and Precise Mechanisms of Control.

Jarosz A, Halo J Viruses. 2024; 16(8).

PMID: 39205286 PMC: 11359688. DOI: 10.3390/v16081312.


GWAS reveals determinants of mobilization rate and dynamics of an active endogenous retrovirus of cattle.

Tang L, Swedlund B, Dupont S, Harland C, Moreira G, Durkin K Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):2154.

PMID: 38461177 PMC: 10924933. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-46434-1.

References
1.
Bologna G, Yvon C, Duvaud S, Veuthey A . N-Terminal myristoylation predictions by ensembles of neural networks. Proteomics. 2004; 4(6):1626-32. DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200300783. View

2.
Cullen H, Schorn A . Endogenous Retroviruses Walk a Fine Line between Priming and Silencing. Viruses. 2020; 12(8). PMC: 7472051. DOI: 10.3390/v12080792. View

3.
Zamudio N, Bourchis D . Transposable elements in the mammalian germline: a comfortable niche or a deadly trap?. Heredity (Edinb). 2010; 105(1):92-104. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2010.53. View

4.
Dewannieux M, Dupressoir A, Harper F, Pierron G, Heidmann T . Identification of autonomous IAP LTR retrotransposons mobile in mammalian cells. Nat Genet. 2004; 36(5):534-9. DOI: 10.1038/ng1353. View

5.
Artesi M, Hahaut V, Cole B, Lambrechts L, Ashrafi F, Marcais A . PCIP-seq: simultaneous sequencing of integrated viral genomes and their insertion sites with long reads. Genome Biol. 2021; 22(1):97. PMC: 8025556. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-021-02307-0. View