Health Care Professionals' Perspectives Before and After Use of EDialogue for Team-Based Digital Communication Across Settings: Qualitative Study

Overview

Journal JMIR Hum Factors

Specialty Health Services

Date 2024 Mar 8

PMID 38457798

Authors

Lili Worre Hopfner Jensen

Ole Rahbek

Rikke Emilie Kildahl Lauritsen

Soren Kold

Birthe Dinesen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Orthopedic surgical treatment is a transversal task that requires the active involvement of patients, relatives, and health care professionals (HCPs) across various settings. However, after hospital discharge, communication is challenged and undertaken primarily by phone. New digital communication solutions have the potential to create a space for seamless and patient-centered dialogue across discipline and sector boundaries. When evaluating new communication solutions, knowledge about HCPs' needs and perspectives of use must be explored, as it is they who are responsible for implementing changes in practice.

Objective: This study aimed to (1) investigate HCPs' perceptions of current communication pathways (phase 1) and (2) explore their experiences of using a simple messenger-like solution (eDialogue) for team-based digital communication across settings (phase 2).

Methods: We used a triangulation of qualitative data collection techniques, including document analysis, observations, focus groups, and individual interviews of HCPs before (n=28) and after (n=12) their use of eDialogue. Data collection and analysis were inspired by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to specifically understand facilitators and barriers to implementation as perceived by HCPs.

Results: HCPs perceive current communication pathways as insufficient for both patients and themselves. Phone calls are disruptive, and there is a lack of direct communication modalities when communication crosses sector boundaries. HCPs experienced the use of eDialogue as a quick and easy way for timely interdisciplinary interaction with patients and other HCPs across settings; however, concerns were raised about time consumption.

Conclusions: eDialogue can provide needed support for interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral patient-centered communication. However, future studies of this solution should address its impact and the use of resources.

Citing Articles

Team-based digital communication reduced patient-initiated phone calls to the hospital and improved patient satisfaction after orthopedic surgery: a randomized controlled trial in 70 patients.

Jensen L, Kold S, Dinesen B, Husum H, Skals R, Eiskjaer S Acta Orthop. 2024; 95:225-232.

PMID: 38757681 PMC: 11100491. DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2024.40707.

References

Pereno A, Eriksson D . A multi-stakeholder perspective on sustainable healthcare: From 2030 onwards. Futures. 2020; 122:102605. PMC: 7375280. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2020.102605. View

Murray E, Hekler E, Andersson G, Collins L, Doherty A, Hollis C . Evaluating Digital Health Interventions: Key Questions and Approaches. Am J Prev Med. 2016; 51(5):843-851. PMC: 5324832. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.06.008. View

Holm K, Brodsgaard A, Zachariassen G, Smith A, Clemensen J . Parent perspectives of neonatal tele-homecare: A qualitative study. J Telemed Telecare. 2018; 25(4):221-229. DOI: 10.1177/1357633X18765059. View

Herndon J, Pollick K . Continuing concerns, new challenges, and next steps in physician-patient communication. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84(2):309-15. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200202000-00019. View

Jensen B, Vardinghus-Nielsen H, Mills E, Moller A, Gnesin F, Zylyftari N . "Like a rainy weather inside of me": Qualitative content analysis of telephone consultations concerning back pain preceding out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Int Emerg Nurs. 2022; 64:101200. DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2022.101200. View

Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J . Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19(6):349-57. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. View

Oslock W, Satiani B, Way D, Tamer R, Maurer J, Hawley J . A contemporary reassessment of the US surgical workforce through 2050 predicts continued shortages and increased productivity demands. Am J Surg. 2021; 223(1):28-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.07.033. View

Cronin R, Davis S, Shenson J, Chen Q, Rosenbloom S, Jackson G . Growth of Secure Messaging Through a Patient Portal as a Form of Outpatient Interaction across Clinical Specialties. Appl Clin Inform. 2015; 6(2):288-304. PMC: 4493331. DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2014-12-RA-0117. View

Danbjorg D, Wagner L, Kristensen B, Clemensen J . Intervention among new parents followed up by an interview study exploring their experiences of telemedicine after early postnatal discharge. Midwifery. 2015; 31(6):574-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.02.007. View

10.

Kirk M, Kelley C, Yankey N, Birken S, Abadie B, Damschroder L . A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Implement Sci. 2016; 11:72. PMC: 4869309. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0437-z. View

11.

Balakrishnan A, Palmer N, Odisho A . "Can you hear me now?": postoperative patient-initiated communication with providers. Am J Manag Care. 2020; 26(10):e333-e341. DOI: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.88507. View

12.

Lindkvist R, Sjostrom-Strand A, Landgren K, Johnsson B, Stenstrom P, Hallstrom I . "In a Way We Took the Hospital Home"-A Descriptive Mixed-Methods Study of Parents' Usage and Experiences of eHealth for Self-Management after Hospital Discharge Due to Pediatric Surgery or Preterm Birth. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(12). PMC: 8296293. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18126480. View

13.

Baer D . Patient-physician e-mail communication: the kaiser permanente experience. J Oncol Pract. 2011; 7(4):230-3. PMC: 3140444. DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000323. View

14.

Voruganti T, Grunfeld E, Jamieson T, Kurahashi A, Lokuge B, Krzyzanowska M . My Team of Care Study: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Web-Based Communication Tool for Collaborative Care in Patients With Advanced Cancer. J Med Internet Res. 2017; 19(7):e219. PMC: 5539387. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7421. View

15.

Damschroder L, Aron D, Keith R, Kirsh S, Alexander J, Lowery J . Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009; 4:50. PMC: 2736161. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50. View

16.

Ekstedt M, Borosund E, Svenningsen I, Ruland C . Reducing errors through a web-based self-management support system. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014; 201:328-34. View

17.

Gund A, Sjoqvist B, Wigert H, Hentz E, Lindecrantz K, Bry K . A randomized controlled study about the use of eHealth in the home health care of premature infants. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013; 13:22. PMC: 3583709. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-22. View

18.

DeAntonio J, Kang H, Cockrell H, Rothstein W, Oiticica C, Lanning D . Utilization of a handheld telemedicine device in postoperative pediatric surgical care. J Pediatr Surg. 2019; 54(5):1005-1008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.01.032. View

19.

Gulmans J, Vollenbroek-Hutten M, van Gemert-Pijnen L, van Harten W . A web-based communication system for integrated care in cerebral palsy: experienced contribution to parent-professional communication. Int J Integr Care. 2012; 12:e9. PMC: 3429144. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.672. View

20.

Husain A, Cohen E, Dubrowski R, Jamieson T, Kurahashi A, Lokuge B . A Clinical Communication Tool (Loop) for Team-Based Care in Pediatric and Adult Care Settings: Hybrid Mixed Methods Implementation Study. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(3):e25505. PMC: 8294640. DOI: 10.2196/25505. View