» Articles » PMID: 26171076

Growth of Secure Messaging Through a Patient Portal As a Form of Outpatient Interaction Across Clinical Specialties

Overview
Publisher Thieme
Date 2015 Jul 15
PMID 26171076
Citations 53
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Patient portals are online applications that allow patients to interact with healthcare organizations. Portal adoption is increasing, and secure messaging between patients and healthcare providers is an emerging form of outpatient interaction. Research about portals and messaging has focused on medical specialties. We characterized adoption of secure messaging and the contribution of messaging to outpatient interactions across diverse clinical specialties after broad portal deployment.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study at Vanderbilt University Medical Center examined use of patient-initiated secure messages and clinic visits in the three years following full deployment of a patient portal across adult and pediatric specialties. We measured the proportion of outpatient interactions (i.e., messages plus clinic visits) conducted through secure messaging by specialty over time. Generalized estimating equations measured the likelihood of message-based versus clinic outpatient interaction across clinical specialties.

Results: Over the study period, 2,422,114 clinic visits occurred, and 82,159 unique portal users initiated 948,428 messages to 1,924 recipients. Medicine participated in the most message exchanges (742,454 messages; 78.3% of all messages sent), followed by surgery (84,001; 8.9%) and obstetrics/gynecology (53,424; 5.6%). The proportion of outpatient interaction through messaging increased from 12.9% in 2008 to 33.0% in 2009 and 39.8% in 2010 (p<0.001). Medicine had the highest proportion of outpatient interaction conducted through messaging in 2008 (23.3% of outpatient interactions in medicine). By 2010, this proportion was highest for obstetrics/gynecology (83.4%), dermatology (71.6%), and medicine (56.7%). Growth in likelihood of message-based interaction was greater for anesthesiology, dermatology, obstetrics/gynecology, pediatrics, and psychiatry than for medicine (p<0.001).

Conclusions: This study demonstrates rapid adoption of secure messaging across diverse clinical specialties, with messaging interactions exceeding face-to-face clinic visits for some specialties. As patient portal and secure messaging adoption increase beyond medicine and primary care, research is needed to understand the implications for provider workload and patient care.

Citing Articles

Team-based digital communication reduced patient-initiated phone calls to the hospital and improved patient satisfaction after orthopedic surgery: a randomized controlled trial in 70 patients.

Jensen L, Kold S, Dinesen B, Husum H, Skals R, Eiskjaer S Acta Orthop. 2024; 95:225-232.

PMID: 38757681 PMC: 11100491. DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2024.40707.


Patient Perspectives on Communication Pathways After Orthopedic Surgery and Discharge and Evaluation of Team-Based Digital Communication: Qualitative Exploratory Study.

Jensen L, Rahbek O, Lauritsen R, Kold S, Dinesen B JMIR Hum Factors. 2024; 11:e49696.

PMID: 38551641 PMC: 11015373. DOI: 10.2196/49696.


Health Care Professionals' Perspectives Before and After Use of eDialogue for Team-Based Digital Communication Across Settings: Qualitative Study.

Jensen L, Rahbek O, Lauritsen R, Kold S, Dinesen B JMIR Hum Factors. 2024; 11:e53391.

PMID: 38457798 PMC: 10960209. DOI: 10.2196/53391.


Physician Burnout: Evidence-Based Roadmaps to Prioritizing and Supporting Personal Wellbeing.

Underdahl L, Ditri M, Duthely L J Healthc Leadersh. 2024; 16:15-27.

PMID: 38192639 PMC: 10773242. DOI: 10.2147/JHL.S389245.


Sudden Shift to Telehealth in COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Disparities in Use of Telehealth for Prenatal Care in a Large Midwifery Service.

Smith D, Thumm E, Anderson J, Kissler K, Reed S, Centi S J Midwifery Womens Health. 2023; 69(4):522-530.

PMID: 38111228 PMC: 11182882. DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13601.


References
1.
Wallwiener M, Wallwiener C, Kansy J, Seeger H, Rajab T . Impact of electronic messaging on the patient-physician interaction. J Telemed Telecare. 2009; 15(5):243-50. DOI: 10.1258/jtt.2009.090111. View

2.
Weingart S, Rind D, Tofias Z, Sands D . Who uses the patient internet portal? The PatientSite experience. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005; 13(1):91-5. PMC: 1380201. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M1833. View

3.
Gann B . Giving patients choice and control: health informatics on the patient journey. Yearb Med Inform. 2012; 7:70-3. View

4.
Bryce C, Zickmund S, Hess R, McTigue K, Olshansky E, Fitzgerald K . Value versus user fees: perspectives of patients before and after using a web-based portal for management of diabetes. Telemed J E Health. 2009; 14(10):1035-43. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2008.0005. View

5.
White C, Moyer C, Stern D, Katz S . A content analysis of e-mail communication between patients and their providers: patients get the message. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004; 11(4):260-7. PMC: 436072. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M1445. View