Assessing the Feasibility of Free DNA for Disaster Victim Identification and Forensic Applications

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2024 Mar 5

PMID 38443390

Authors

Wikanda Worrapitirungsi

Tikumphorn Sathirapatya

Poonyapat Sukawutthiya

Kornkiat Vongpaisarnsin

Pagparpat Varrathyarom

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

In tropical disaster victim identification (DVI) scenarios, challenging environmental conditions lead to accelerated DNA degradation in remains. To further enhance the utilization of leached DNA from tissue in the preservative solution (termed "free DNA") as an alternative source, we incorporated new results by assessing its integrity in postmortem and decomposing cadavers preserved in DNA/RNA Shield™ and modified TENT, with silica-based purification (QIAquick) for faster processing. The psoas muscle tissues of one decomposed and ten cadavers were preserved in each solution at 25 °C and 35 °C for 3 months. Free DNA efficiency was compared with individual reference samples for reliable results in quantity, quality, and STR profiles. The findings revealed that DNA/RNA Shield™ effectively preserves free DNA integrity for extended storage, while modified TENT is more suitable for short-term storage due to higher degradation levels. Moreover, the use of free DNA samples with massive parallel sequencing displays potential for forensic DNA analysis. Successful amplification of the mtDNA control region enables variant calling and heteroplasmy analysis while also serving as quality control using ACTB and enabling differentiation within the 16S rRNA region for microbiome analysis. The simplicity of handling free DNA for PCR-based forensic analysis adds to its potential for various applications, including DVI and field-based analysis of biological evidence.

References

Cruz-Leon S, Vanderlinden W, Muller P, Forster T, Staudt G, Lin Y . Twisting DNA by salt. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022; 50(10):5726-5738. PMC: 9177979. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac445. View

Sorensen A, Rahman E, Canela C, Gangitano D, Hughes-Stamm S . Preservation and rapid purification of DNA from decomposing human tissue samples. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016; 25:182-190. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.05.013. View

Liang X, Han X, Liu C, Du W, Zhong P, Huang L . Integrating the salivary microbiome in the forensic toolkit by 16S rRNA gene: potential application in body fluid identification and biogeographic inference. Int J Legal Med. 2022; 136(4):975-985. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-022-02831-z. View

Ye K, Lu J, Ma F, Keinan A, Gu Z . Extensive pathogenicity of mitochondrial heteroplasmy in healthy human individuals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(29):10654-9. PMC: 4115537. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1403521111. View

Sorensen A, Berry C, Bruce D, Gahan M, Hughes-Stamm S, McNevin D . Direct-to-PCR tissue preservation for DNA profiling. Int J Legal Med. 2015; 130(3):607-13. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-015-1286-z. View

Hughes-Stamm S, Ashton K, Daal A . Assessment of DNA degradation and the genotyping success of highly degraded samples. Int J Legal Med. 2010; 125(3):341-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-010-0455-3. View

Lloyd-Price J, Mahurkar A, Rahnavard G, Crabtree J, Orvis J, Hall A . Strains, functions and dynamics in the expanded Human Microbiome Project. Nature. 2017; 550(7674):61-66. PMC: 5831082. DOI: 10.1038/nature23889. View

Dmitrieva N, Burg M . Analysis of DNA breaks, DNA damage response, and apoptosis produced by high NaCl. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008; 295(6):F1678-88. PMC: 2604838. DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.90424.2008. View

Angebault C, Ghozlane A, Volant S, Botterel F, dEnfert C, Bougnoux M . Combined bacterial and fungal intestinal microbiota analyses: Impact of storage conditions and DNA extraction protocols. PLoS One. 2018; 13(8):e0201174. PMC: 6075747. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201174. View

10.

Holland M, Makova K, McElhoe J . Deep-Coverage MPS Analysis of Heteroplasmic Variants within the mtGenome Allows for Frequent Differentiation of Maternal Relatives. Genes (Basel). 2018; 9(3). PMC: 5867845. DOI: 10.3390/genes9030124. View

11.

Peeva V, Blei D, Trombly G, Corsi S, Szukszto M, Rebelo-Guiomar P . Linear mitochondrial DNA is rapidly degraded by components of the replication machinery. Nat Commun. 2018; 9(1):1727. PMC: 5928156. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04131-w. View

12.

Tozzo P, Amico I, Delicati A, Toselli F, Caenazzo L . Post-Mortem Interval and Microbiome Analysis through 16S rRNA Analysis: A Systematic Review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(11). PMC: 9689864. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12112641. View

13.

Fazzini F, Fendt L, Schonherr S, Forer L, Schopf B, Streiter G . Analyzing Low-Level mtDNA Heteroplasmy-Pitfalls and Challenges from Bench to Benchmarking. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(2). PMC: 7832847. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22020935. View

14.

Karadayi S . Assessment of the link between evidence and crime scene through soil bacterial and fungal microbiome: A mock case in forensic study. Forensic Sci Int. 2021; 329:111060. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.111060. View

15.

Tan Z, Chen S . Nucleic acid helix stability: effects of salt concentration, cation valence and size, and chain length. Biophys J. 2005; 90(4):1175-90. PMC: 1367269. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.070904. View

16.

Sharpe A, Barrios S, Gayer S, Allan-Perkins E, Stein D, Appiah-Madson H . DESS deconstructed: Is EDTA solely responsible for protection of high molecular weight DNA in this common tissue preservative?. PLoS One. 2020; 15(8):e0237356. PMC: 7440624. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237356. View

17.

Jager A, Alvarez M, Davis C, Guzman E, Han Y, Way L . Developmental validation of the MiSeq FGx Forensic Genomics System for Targeted Next Generation Sequencing in Forensic DNA Casework and Database Laboratories. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017; 28:52-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.01.011. View

18.

Turingan R, Brown J, Kaplun L, Smith J, Watson J, Boyd D . Identification of human remains using Rapid DNA analysis. Int J Legal Med. 2019; 134(3):863-872. PMC: 7181457. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-019-02186-y. View

19.

Watherston J, McNevin D, Gahan M, Bruce D, Ward J . Current and emerging tools for the recovery of genetic information from post mortem samples: New directions for disaster victim identification. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018; 37:270-282. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.08.016. View

20.

Michaud C, Foran D . Simplified field preservation of tissues for subsequent DNA analyses. J Forensic Sci. 2011; 56(4):846-52. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01771.x. View