» Articles » PMID: 38441780

Evaluation of Extraction Methods to Detect Noroviruses in Ready-to-Eat Raw Milk Minas Artisanal Cheese

Abstract

This study aimed to assess two homogenization methods to recover norovirus from Minas artisanal cheese (MAC) made with raw bovine milk obtained from four microregions of the Minas Gerais state, Brazil, with different ripening times and geographical and abiotic characteristics. For this purpose, 33 fiscal samples were artificially contaminated with norovirus GI and GII, and Mengovirus (MgV), used as an internal process control (IPC). TRIzol reagent and Proteinase K homogenization methods were evaluated for all samples were then subjected to RNA extraction using viral magnetic beads and RT-qPCR Taqman for viral detection/quantification. Proteinase K method showed better efficiency results for both norovirus GI and GII, with means recovery efficiency of 45.7% (95% CI 34.3-57.2%) and 41.4% (95% CI 29.1-53.6%), respectively, when compared to TRIzol method (16.6% GI, 95% CI 8.4-24.9%, and 12.3% GII, 95% CI 7.0-17.6%). The limits of detection for norovirus GI and GII for this method were 10GC/g and 10GC/g, respectively, independent of cheese origin. MgV was detected and revealed in 100% success rate in all types of cheese, with mean recovery efficiency of 25.6% for Proteinase K, and 3.8% for the TRIzol method. According to cheese origin, Triangulo Mineiro MAC had the highest mean recovery rates for the three viral targets surveyed (89% GI, 87% GII, and 51% MgV), while Serro MAC showed the lowest rates (p < 0.001). Those results indicate that the proteinase K adapted method is suitable for norovirus GI and GII detection in MAC and corroborated MgV as an applicable IPC to be used during the process.

Citing Articles

Assessment of Gastroenteric Viruses in Marketed Bivalve Mollusks in the Tourist Cities of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2022.

Cantelli C, Tavares G, Sarmento S, Burlandy F, Fumian T, Maranhao A Viruses. 2024; 16(3).

PMID: 38543684 PMC: 10974528. DOI: 10.3390/v16030317.

References
1.
Atmar R, Ramani S, Estes M . Human noroviruses: recent advances in a 50-year history. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2018; 31(5):422-432. DOI: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000476. View

2.
Baert L, Uyttendaele M, Debevere J . Evaluation of viral extraction methods on a broad range of Ready-To-Eat foods with conventional and real-time RT-PCR for Norovirus GII detection. Int J Food Microbiol. 2008; 123(1-2):101-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.12.020. View

3.
Battistini R, Rossini I, Listorti V, Ercolini C, Maurella C, Serracca L . HAV detection from milk-based products containing soft fruits: Comparison between four different extraction methods. Int J Food Microbiol. 2020; 328:108661. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108661. View

4.
Burke R, Mattison C, Pindyck T, Dahl R, Rudd J, Bi D . Burden of Norovirus in the United States, as Estimated Based on Administrative Data: Updates for Medically Attended Illness and Mortality, 2001-2015. Clin Infect Dis. 2020; 73(1):e1-e8. PMC: 8112883. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa438. View

5.
Chhabra P, de Graaf M, Parra G, Chan M, Green K, Martella V . Updated classification of norovirus genogroups and genotypes. J Gen Virol. 2019; 100(10):1393-1406. PMC: 7011714. DOI: 10.1099/jgv.0.001318. View