» Articles » PMID: 38436775

Bacterial Biofilm Growth and Perturbation by Serine Protease from Bacillus Sp

Overview
Journal Arch Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2024 Mar 4
PMID 38436775
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In nature, bacteria are ubiquitous and can be categorized as beneficial or harmless to humans, but most bacteria have one thing in common which is their ability to produce biofilm. Biofilm is encased within an extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) which provides resistance against antimicrobial agents. Protease enzymes have the potential to degrade or promote the growth of bacterial biofilms. In this study, the effects of a recombinant intracellular serine protease from Bacillus sp. (SPB) on biofilms from Staphylococcus aureus, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were analyzed. SPB was purified using HisTrap HP column and concentrated using Amicon 30 ultra-centrifugal filter. SPB was added with varying enzyme activity and assay incubation period after biofilms were formed in 96-well plates. SPB was observed to have contrasting effects on different bacterial biofilms, where biofilm degradations were observed for both 7-day-old A. baumannii (37.26%) and S. aureus (71.51%) biofilms. Meanwhile, SPB promoted growth of P. aeruginosa biofilm up to 176.32%. Compatibility between protein components in S. aureus biofilm with SPB as well as a simpler membrane structure morphology led to higher biofilm degradation for S. aureus compared to A. baumannii. However, SPB promoted growth of P. aeruginosa biofilm due likely to its degrading protein factors that are responsible for biofilm detachment and dispersion, thus resulting in more multi-layered biofilm formation. Commercial protease Savinase which was used as a comparison showed degradation for all three bacterial biofilms. The results obtained are unique and will expand our understanding on the effects that bacterial proteases have toward biofilms.

Citing Articles

Hidden Places for Foodborne Bacterial Pathogens and Novel Approaches to Control Biofilms in the Meat Industry.

Alves V, Tadielo L, Pires A, Pereira M, Bersot L, De Martinis E Foods. 2025; 13(24.

PMID: 39766937 PMC: 11675819. DOI: 10.3390/foods13243994.


Essential Oil to Enhance the Effect of Imipenem against Axenic and Co-Cultures of and .

Fimbres-Garcia J, Flores-Sauceda M, Othon-Diaz E, Garcia-Galaz A, Tapia-Rodriguez M, Silva-Espinoza B Antibiotics (Basel). 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38786172 PMC: 11117758. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13050444.

References
1.
Ali A, Zahra A, Kamthan M, Husain F, Albalawi T, Zubair M . Microbial Biofilms: Applications, Clinical Consequences, and Alternative Therapies. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(8). PMC: 10459820. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11081934. View

2.
Bjerga G, Larsen O, Arsin H, Williamson A, Garcia-Moyano A, Leiros I . Mutational analysis of the pro-peptide of a marine intracellular subtilisin protease supports its role in inhibition. Proteins. 2018; 86(9):965-977. PMC: 6220982. DOI: 10.1002/prot.25528. View

3.
Bornhorst J, Falke J . Purification of proteins using polyhistidine affinity tags. Methods Enzymol. 2000; 326:245-54. PMC: 2909483. DOI: 10.1016/s0076-6879(00)26058-8. View

4.
Brandenburg K, Weaver Jr A, Karna S, You T, Chen P, Stryk S . Formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms in Full-thickness Scald Burn Wounds in Rats. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):13627. PMC: 6754504. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-50003-8. View

5.
Feng Y, Wang H, Lu H, Yi L, Hong L . Effects of ClpP protease on biofilm formation of Enterococcus faecalis. J Appl Oral Sci. 2021; 29:e20200733. PMC: 7934281. DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0733. View