» Articles » PMID: 33656065

Effects of ClpP Protease on Biofilm Formation of Enterococcus Faecalis

Overview
Journal J Appl Oral Sci
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2021 Mar 3
PMID 33656065
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis), one of the main pathogens responsible for refractory periapical periodontitis and nosocomial infections, exhibits markedly higher pathogenicity in biofilms. Studies have shown that caseinolytic protease P (ClpP) is involved in biofilm formation. However, to date, few studies have investigated the role of ClpP in the survival of E. faecalis, and in enhancing biofilm formation. Therefore, we investigated the role of ClpP in the formation of E. faecalis biofilms.

Methodology: In our study, we used homologous recombination to construct clpP deleted and clpP complement strains of E. faecalis ATCC 29212. A viable colony counting method was used to analyze the growth patterns of E. faecalis. Crystal violet staining (CV) and confocal scanning laser microscopy (CLSM) were used to characterize biofilm mass formation and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to observe the biofilm microstructure. Data was statistically analyzed via Student's t-test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Results: The results exhibited altered growth patterns for the clpP deletion strains and depleted polysaccharide matrix, resulting in reduced biofilm formation capacity compared to the standard strains. Moreover, ClpP was observed to increase biofilm formation in E. faecalis.

Conclusion: Our study shows that ClpP can increase biofilm formation in E. faecalis and emphasizes the importance of ClpP as a potential target against E. faecalis.

Citing Articles

-mediated regulation of growth and biofilm formation in .

Zhou J, Ma Q, Liang J, Pan Y, Chen Y, Yu S Front Microbiol. 2025; 15:1507928.

PMID: 39895941 PMC: 11782273. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1507928.


Novel function of single-target regulator NorR involved in swarming motility and biofilm formation revealed in Vibrio alginolyticus.

Chen T, Zhou X, Feng R, Shi S, Chen X, Wei B BMC Biol. 2024; 22(1):253.

PMID: 39506750 PMC: 11542441. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-024-02057-y.


Strategies and mechanisms targeting biofilms associated with endodontic infections: a comprehensive review.

Yang S, Meng X, Zhen Y, Baima Q, Wang Y, Jiang X Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024; 14:1433313.

PMID: 39091674 PMC: 11291369. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1433313.


Coaggregated E. faecalis with F. nucleatum regulated environmental stress responses and inflammatory effects.

Zhou J, Yuan Z, Yang R, Liu T, Lu X, Huang W Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2024; 108(1):336.

PMID: 38761182 PMC: 11102388. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-024-13172-9.


Bacterial biofilm growth and perturbation by serine protease from Bacillus sp.

Yunus J, Wan Dagang W, Jamaluddin H, Jemon K, Mohamad S, Jonet M Arch Microbiol. 2024; 206(4):138.

PMID: 38436775 DOI: 10.1007/s00203-024-03857-0.


References
1.
Zheng J, Wu Y, Lin Z, Wang G, Jiang S, Sun X . ClpP participates in stress tolerance, biofilm formation, antimicrobial tolerance, and virulence of Enterococcus faecalis. BMC Microbiol. 2020; 20(1):30. PMC: 7006429. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-020-1719-9. View

2.
Yu M, Kim M, Rosa V, Hwang Y, Fabbro M, Sohn W . Role of extracellular DNA in Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation and its susceptibility to sodium hypochlorite. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019; 27:e20180699. PMC: 9648955. DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0699. View

3.
Thomas V, Hancock L . Suicide and fratricide in bacterial biofilms. Int J Artif Organs. 2009; 32(9):537-44. DOI: 10.1177/039139880903200902. View

4.
Hall B, Breidenstein E, de la Fuente-Nunez C, Reffuveille F, Mawla G, Hancock R . Two Isoforms of Clp Peptidase in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Control Distinct Aspects of Cellular Physiology. J Bacteriol. 2016; 199(3). PMC: 5237113. DOI: 10.1128/JB.00568-16. View

5.
Li W, Liu H, Xu Q . Extracellular dextran and DNA affect the formation of Enterococcus faecalis biofilms and their susceptibility to 2% chlorhexidine. J Endod. 2012; 38(7):894-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.04.007. View