Clinical Delivery of Overground Exoskeleton Gait Training in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury Across the Continuum of Care: A Retrospective Analysis

Overview

Journal Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil

Specialties Emergency Medicine
Rehabilitation Medicine

Date 2024 Mar 4

PMID 38433740

Authors

Dannae Arnold

Jaime Gillespie

Monica Bennett

Librada Callender

Seema Sikka

Rita Hamilton

Simon Driver

Chad Swank

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: After spinal cord injury (SCI), inpatient rehabilitation begins and continues through outpatient therapy. Overground exoskeleton gait training (OEGT) has been shown to be feasible in both settings, yet its use as an intervention across the continuum has not yet been reported.

Objectives: This study describes OEGT for patients with SCI across the continuum and its effects on clinical outcomes.

Methods: Medical records of patients with SCI who completed at least one OEGT session during inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation from 2018 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury-II (WISCI-II) scores, and OEGT session details (frequency, "walk" time, "up" time, and step count) were extracted.

Results: Eighteen patients [male (83%), White (61%), aged 37.4 ± 15 years, with tetraplegia (50%), American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale A (28%), B (22%), C (39%), D (11%)] completed OEGT sessions (motor complete, 18.2 ± 10.3; motor incomplete, 16.7 ± 7.7) over approximately 18 weeks (motor complete, 15.1 ± 6.4; motor incomplete, 19.0 ± 8.2). Patients demonstrated improved OEGT session tolerance on device metrics including "walk" time (motor complete, 7:51 ± 4:42 to 24:50 ± 9:35 minutes; motor incomplete, 12:16 ± 6:01 to 20:01 ± 08:05 minutes), "up" time (motor complete, 16:03 ± 7:41 to 29:49 ± 12:44 minutes; motor incomplete, 16:38 ± 4:51 to 23:06 ± 08:50 minutes), and step count (motor complete, 340 ± 295.9 to 840.2 ± 379.4; motor incomplete, 372.3 ± 225.2 to 713.2 ± 272). Across therapy settings, patients with motor complete SCI experienced improvement in WISCI-II scores from 0 ± 0 at inpatient admission to 3 ± 4.6 by outpatient discharge, whereas the motor incomplete group demonstrated a change of 0.2 ± 0.4 to 9.0 ± 6.4.

Conclusion: Patients completed OEGT across the therapy continuum. Patients with motor incomplete SCI experienced clinically meaningful improvements in walking function.

References

Scivoletto G, Tamburella F, Laurenza L, Foti C, Ditunno J, Molinari M . Validity and reliability of the 10-m walk test and the 6-min walk test in spinal cord injury patients. Spinal Cord. 2011; 49(6):736-40. DOI: 10.1038/sc.2010.180. View

Kaiser A, Chan K, Pakosh M, Musselman K . Characteristics of activity-based therapy interventions for people living with spinal cord injury or disease across the continuum of care: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 2020; 10(7):e040014. PMC: 7380728. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040014. View

Shackleton C, Evans R, Shamley D, West S, Albertus Y . Effectiveness of over-ground robotic locomotor training in improving walking performance, cardiovascular demands, secondary complications and user-satisfaction in individuals with spinal cord injuries: A systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2019; 51(10):723-733. DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2601. View

Scivoletto G, Morganti B, Molinari M . Early versus delayed inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation: an Italian study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86(3):512-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.05.021. View

Baunsgaard C, Nissen U, Brust A, Frotzler A, Ribeill C, Kalke Y . Gait training after spinal cord injury: safety, feasibility and gait function following 8 weeks of training with the exoskeletons from Ekso Bionics. Spinal Cord. 2017; 56(2):106-116. DOI: 10.1038/s41393-017-0013-7. View

Manns P, Hurd C, Yang J . Perspectives of people with spinal cord injury learning to walk using a powered exoskeleton. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019; 16(1):94. PMC: 6642539. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-019-0565-1. View

El Tecle N, Dahdaleh N, Bydon M, Ray W, Torner J, Hitchon P . The natural history of complete spinal cord injury: a pooled analysis of 1162 patients and a meta-analysis of modern data. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018; 28(4):436-443. DOI: 10.3171/2017.7.SPINE17107. View

Post M, van Leeuwen C . Psychosocial issues in spinal cord injury: a review. Spinal Cord. 2012; 50(5):382-9. DOI: 10.1038/sc.2011.182. View

Moore J, Potter K, Blankshain K, Kaplan S, ODwyer L, Sullivan J . A Core Set of Outcome Measures for Adults With Neurologic Conditions Undergoing Rehabilitation: A CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2018; 42(3):174-220. PMC: 6023606. DOI: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000229. View

10.

Swank C, Trammell M, Bennett M, Ochoa C, Callender L, Sikka S . The utilization of an overground robotic exoskeleton for gait training during inpatient rehabilitation-single-center retrospective findings. Int J Rehabil Res. 2020; 43(3):206-213. DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000409. View

11.

Dittuno P, Ditunno Jr J, Dittuno Jr J . Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI II): scale revision. Spinal Cord. 2002; 39(12):654-6. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101223. View

12.

Behrman A, Bowden M, Nair P . Neuroplasticity after spinal cord injury and training: an emerging paradigm shift in rehabilitation and walking recovery. Phys Ther. 2006; 86(10):1406-25. DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20050212. View

13.

Miller L, Zimmermann A, Herbert W . Clinical effectiveness and safety of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in patients with spinal cord injury: systematic review with meta-analysis. Med Devices (Auckl). 2016; 9:455-66. PMC: 4809334. DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S103102. View

14.

Cheung E, Ng T, Yu K, Kwan R, Cheing G . Robot-Assisted Training for People With Spinal Cord Injury: A Meta-Analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 98(11):2320-2331.e12. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.05.015. View

15.

Delgado A, Escalon M, Bryce T, Weinrauch W, Suarez S, Kozlowski A . Safety and feasibility of exoskeleton-assisted walking during acute/sub-acute SCI in an inpatient rehabilitation facility: A single-group preliminary study. J Spinal Cord Med. 2019; 43(5):657-666. PMC: 7534310. DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1671076. View

16.

Spiess M, Muller R, Rupp R, Schuld C, van Hedel H . Conversion in ASIA impairment scale during the first year after traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2009; 26(11):2027-36. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2008.0760. View

17.

Guilcher S, Munce S, Couris C, Fung K, Craven B, Verrier M . Health care utilization in non-traumatic and traumatic spinal cord injury: a population-based study. Spinal Cord. 2009; 48(1):45-50. DOI: 10.1038/sc.2009.78. View

18.

Burns A, Delparte J, Patrick M, Marino R, Ditunno J . The reproducibility and convergent validity of the walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI) in chronic spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011; 25(2):149-57. DOI: 10.1177/1545968310376756. View

19.

Amatachaya S, Naewla S, Srisim K, Arrayawichanon P, Siritaratiwat W . Concurrent validity of the 10-meter walk test as compared with the 6-minute walk test in patients with spinal cord injury at various levels of ability. Spinal Cord. 2014; 52(4):333-6. DOI: 10.1038/sc.2013.171. View

20.

Burns S, Golding D, Rolle Jr W, Graziani V, Ditunno Jr J . Recovery of ambulation in motor-incomplete tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997; 78(11):1169-72. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90326-9. View