» Articles » PMID: 38431646

Black Adolescents' Motivation to Resist the False Dichotomy Between Mathematics Achievement and Racial Identity

Overview
Journal NPJ Sci Learn
Specialty Psychology
Date 2024 Mar 2
PMID 38431646
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study investigates the racial-mathematical identity profiles of Black American adolescents. Survey data were collected in five schools across one U.S. urban school district at two time points (spring 2018 [n = 197] and spring 2019 [n = 210]). Based on extant research regarding psychological response patterns to racialized school stress, we investigated the existence of an identity negotiation pattern in which students were motivated to resist negative stereotypes about Black people by achieving well in mathematics. We conducted a latent profile analysis combining students' self-beliefs across five indicators: racial centrality, racial public regard, mathematics attainment value, mathematics mastery experiences, and resistance motivation. Three distinct racial-mathematical identity profiles emerged: (1) Mathematics Devalued/Ambivalent, (2) Moderately Math Attained, and (3) Resistors. We found associations between profile membership and students' gender, negative math emotions, and their receipt of cultural and critical mathematics instruction. We also found an association between the identity profiles and school type (academically selective "magnet" schools vs. open-enrollment neighborhood schools), but not in the direction that might be assumed. Moreover, we found that certain school environment factors (i.e., racial stereotyping and cultural and critical mathematics instruction) were significantly different in racially diverse magnet schools than in the neighborhood schools. Overall, our data reveal the existence of a highly motivated Resistor profile among Black students, that is predicted by cultural and critical mathematics instruction but underrepresented within this district's selective magnet schools.

Citing Articles

Using social and behavioral science to address achievement inequality.

Brummelman E, van Atteveldt N, Wolf S, Sierksma J NPJ Sci Learn. 2024; 9(1):44.

PMID: 38987262 PMC: 11237010. DOI: 10.1038/s41539-024-00259-1.

References
1.
Muthen B, Asparouhov T . Bayesian structural equation modeling: a more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychol Methods. 2012; 17(3):313-35. DOI: 10.1037/a0026802. View

2.
Okeke N, Howard L, Kurtz-Costes B, Rowley S . Academic Race Stereotypes, Academic Self-Concept, and Racial Centrality in African American Youth. J Black Psychol. 2010; 35(3):366-387. PMC: 2901128. DOI: 10.1177/0095798409333615. View

3.
Voyer D, Voyer S . Gender differences in scholastic achievement: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2014; 140(4):1174-204. DOI: 10.1037/a0036620. View

4.
Johnson S . Latent profile transition analyses and growth mixture models: A very non-technical guide for researchers in child and adolescent development. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2021; 2021(175):111-139. DOI: 10.1002/cad.20398. View

5.
Blanca M, Alarcon R, Arnau J, Bono R, Bendayan R . Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option?. Psicothema. 2017; 29(4):552-557. DOI: 10.7334/psicothema2016.383. View