» Articles » PMID: 38412906

The Role of F-FDG PET in Minimizing Variability in Gross Tumor Volume Delineation of Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Abstract

Background: Accurate gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation is a critical step in radiation therapy treatment planning. However, it is reader dependent and thus susceptible to intra- and inter-reader variability. GTV delineation of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) often relies on CT and MR images.

Purpose: This study investigates the potential role of F-FDG PET in reducing intra- and inter-reader variability thereby improving reproducibility of GTV delineation in STS, without incurring additional costs or radiation exposure.

Materials And Methods: Three readers performed independent GTV delineation of 61 patients with STS using first CT and MR followed by CT, MR, and F-FDG PET images. Each reader performed a total of six delineation trials, three trials per imaging modality group. Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) score and Hausdorff distance (HD) were used to assess both intra- and inter-reader variability using generated simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) GTVs as ground truth. Statistical analysis was performed using a Wilcoxon signed-ranked test.

Results: There was a statistically significant decrease in both intra- and inter-reader variability in GTV delineation using CT, MR F-FDG PET images vs. CT and MR images. This was translated by an increase in the DSC score and a decrease in the HD for GTVs drawn from CT, MR and F-FDG PET images vs. GTVs drawn from CT and MR for all readers and across all three trials.

Conclusion: Incorporation of F-FDG PET into CT and MR images decreased intra- and inter-reader variability and subsequently increased reproducibility of GTV delineation in STS.

References
1.
Blay J, Hindi N, Bollard J, Aguiar Jr S, Angel M, Araya B . SELNET clinical practice guidelines for soft tissue sarcoma and GIST. Cancer Treat Rev. 2021; 102:102312. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102312. View

2.
Ardakani A, Woollard A, Ware H, Gikas P . Soft tissue sarcoma: Recognizing a rare disease. Cleve Clin J Med. 2022; 89(2):73-80. DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.89a.21078. View

3.
Yan D, Lockman D, Martinez A, Wong J, Brabbins D, Vicini F . Computed tomography guided management of interfractional patient variation. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2005; 15(3):168-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2005.01.007. View

4.
Marin T, Zhuo Y, Lahoud R, Tian F, Ma X, Xing F . Deep learning-based GTV contouring modeling inter- and intra- observer variability in sarcomas. Radiother Oncol. 2021; 167:269-276. PMC: 8934266. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.09.034. View

5.
Gambacorta M, Valentini C, Dinapoli N, Boldrini L, Caria N, Barba M . Clinical validation of atlas-based auto-segmentation of pelvic volumes and normal tissue in rectal tumors using auto-segmentation computed system. Acta Oncol. 2013; 52(8):1676-81. DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.754989. View