» Articles » PMID: 38409354

Binary Decisions of Artificial Intelligence to Classify Third Molar Development Around the Legal Age Thresholds of 14, 16 and 18 years

Abstract

Third molar development is used for dental age estimation when all the other teeth are fully mature. In most medicolegal facilities, dental age estimation is an operator-dependent procedure. During the examination of unaccompanied and undocumented minors, this procedure may lead to binary decisions around age thresholds of legal interest, namely the ages of 14, 16 and 18 years. This study aimed to test the performance of artificial intelligence to classify individuals below and above the legal age thresholds of 14, 16 and 18 years using third molar development. The sample consisted of 11,640 panoramic radiographs (9680 used for training and 1960 used for validation) of males (n = 5400) and females (n = 6240) between 6 and 22.9 years. Computer-based image annotation was performed with V7 software (V7labs, London, UK). The region of interest was the mandibular left third molar (T38) outlined with a semi-automated contour. DenseNet121 was the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) of choice and was used with Transfer Learning. After Receiver-operating characteristic curves, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.87 and 0.86 to classify males and females below and above the age of 14, respectively. For the age threshold of 16, the AUC values were 0.88 (males) and 0.83 (females), while for the age of 18, AUC were 0.94 (males) and 0.83 (females). Specificity rates were always between 0.80 and 0.92. Artificial intelligence was able to classify male and females below and above the legal age thresholds of 14, 16 and 18 years with high accuracy.

Citing Articles

A Deep Learning-Based Approach to Detect Lamina Dura Loss on Periapical Radiographs.

Sahin B, Eninanc I J Imaging Inform Med. 2025; 38(1):545-555.

PMID: 39838226 PMC: 11811344. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-025-01405-w.


A probability model for estimating age in young individuals relative to key legal thresholds: 15, 18 or 21-year.

Heldring N, Rezaie A, Larsson A, Gahn R, Zilg B, Camilleri S Int J Legal Med. 2024; 139(1):197-217.

PMID: 39292274 PMC: 11732925. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-024-03324-x.


Insights into dental age estimation: introducing multiple regression data from a Black South African population on modified gustafson's criteria.

Rudolphi F, Steffens L, Shay D, Smit C, Robinson L, Bernitz H Int J Legal Med. 2024; 139(1):143-155.

PMID: 39168896 PMC: 11732868. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-024-03312-1.

References
1.
Cameriere R, Ferrante L, De Angelis D, Scarpino F, Galli F . The comparison between measurement of open apices of third molars and Demirjian stages to test chronological age of over 18 year olds in living subjects. Int J Legal Med. 2008; 122(6):493-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-008-0279-6. View

2.
Goetten I, Oenning A, Silva R, Nuzzolese E, Lourenco Junior E, Franco A . Diagnostic accuracy of the third molar maturity index (I) to assess the age of legal majority in Northern Brazil-population-specific cut-off values. Int J Legal Med. 2022; 136(5):1507-1514. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-022-02857-3. View

3.
Alqahtani S, Hector M, Liversidge H . Brief communication: The London atlas of human tooth development and eruption. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010; 142(3):481-90. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.21258. View

4.
Mohammad N, Ahmad R, Kurniawan A, Mohd Yusof M . Applications of contemporary artificial intelligence technology in forensic odontology as primary forensic identifier: A scoping review. Front Artif Intell. 2022; 5:1049584. PMC: 9763471. DOI: 10.3389/frai.2022.1049584. View

5.
Gunst K, Mesotten K, Carbonez A, Willems G . Third molar root development in relation to chronological age: a large sample sized retrospective study. Forensic Sci Int. 2003; 136(1-3):52-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0379-0738(03)00263-9. View