» Articles » PMID: 18751992

The Comparison Between Measurement of Open Apices of Third Molars and Demirjian Stages to Test Chronological Age of over 18 Year Olds in Living Subjects

Overview
Journal Int J Legal Med
Specialty Forensic Sciences
Date 2008 Aug 30
PMID 18751992
Citations 65
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper concerns a method for assessing adult age based on the relationship between age and the third molar maturity index (I(3M)), which is related to the measurement of the open apices of the third molar. Furthermore, this method was compared to those based on Demirjian's stages G and H. The sample consisted of 906 Caucasian individuals aged between 14 and 23 years (53.6% females and 46.4% males). Orthopantomographs were analyzed by two observers and calibrated by means of the concordance correlation coefficient for the reproducibility of the third molar maturity index (I(3M)) and kappa statistics for reproducibility of the Demirjian stages. Probabilities for an individual to be older than 18 years of age (adult age) were derived using the measurements of the third molar maturity index (I(3M)). These results were exploited to set out a threshold value to assign an individual to juvenile or adult age. A cutoff value of I(3M) = 0.08 was taken. The sensitivity of this test was 70% and specificity was 98%. Furthermore, the proportion of individuals with a correct classification was 83%. The results of the test showed a better specificity when compared to the choice of stage G and a better sensitivity when compared to the choice of stage H for adult age.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Third Molar Maturity Index (I) and Mandibular Condyle Cortication for Determining the Legal Age (18) of Latvian Individuals.

Bokvalde Z, Zamure-Damberga L, Zolovs M, Neimane L Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(4).

PMID: 40002626 PMC: 11854081. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15040475.


Age estimation at 18-year threshold: comparing Demirjian and Cameriere's methods for Thais.

Upalananda W, Khwankaew K, Chormanee K, Chinkanjanaroj A, Pethpand T J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2025; 42(3):28-38.

PMID: 39752637 PMC: 11838840. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14562134.


Third molar maturity index for discriminating between adults and minors: validation in an Iranian sample.

Movahhedian N, Nikmanesh S, Bazooband A J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2025; 42(3):9-19.

PMID: 39752635 PMC: 11838843. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14561902.


Nicodemo's method on dental development: a cross-sectional study with 3,271 children and adolescents.

Valente R, Lima L, Bueno J, Oliveira M, Franco A, Paranhos L Braz Oral Res. 2024; 38:e109.

PMID: 39536201 PMC: 11552453. DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0109.


Legal Dental Age Thresholds Estimation in Croatian Children and Adolescents: Accuracy of the Olze, Haavikko, and Demirjian Methods.

Shi L, Anic-Milosevic S, Galic I Acta Stomatol Croat. 2024; 58(3):194-208.

PMID: 39492862 PMC: 11526825. DOI: 10.15644/asc58/3/1.


References
1.
Cameriere R, Ferrante L, Cingolani M . Precision and reliability of pulp/tooth area ratio (RA) of second molar as indicator of adult age. J Forensic Sci. 2004; 49(6):1319-23. View

2.
Meinl A, Tangl S, Huber C, Maurer B, Watzek G . The chronology of third molar mineralization in the Austrian population--a contribution to forensic age estimation. Forensic Sci Int. 2006; 169(2-3):161-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.08.014. View

3.
Braga J, Heuze Y, Chabadel O, Sonan N, Gueramy A . Non-adult dental age assessment: correspondence analysis and linear regression versus Bayesian predictions. Int J Legal Med. 2004; 119(5):260-74. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-004-0494-8. View

4.
Prieto J, Barberia E, Ortega R, Magana C . Evaluation of chronological age based on third molar development in the Spanish population. Int J Legal Med. 2005; 119(6):349-54. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-005-0530-3. View

5.
Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner J . A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol. 1973; 45(2):211-27. View