» Articles » PMID: 38397866

An Investigation of Metabolic Risk Factors and Gut Microbiota in Unexplained Syncope

Overview
Journal Biomedicines
Date 2024 Feb 24
PMID 38397866
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The pathogenesis of many syncopal episodes remains unexplained. Intestinal dysbiosis could be involved in the pathophysiological mechanisms of syncope due to its connection with the central nervous system via the microbiota-gut-brain axis. This pilot study aimed to explore the specific cardiometabolic risk factors and gut microbiota in unexplained syncope (US), compared to other types of syncope, to assess their similarity or verify their different origins.

Methods: We studied 86 participants with syncope, who were divided into four groups: an orthostatic syncope group (OH, = 24), a neuromediated syncope group (NMS, = 26), a cardiological syncope group (CS, = 9), and an unexplained syncope group (US, = 27). We evaluated the anthropometric, clinical, and metabolic characteristics of the four groups; the α- and β-diversity; and the differences in the abundance of the microbial taxa.

Results: The US group had a lower incidence of systolic hypertension at the first visit and a lower frequency of patients with nocturnal hypertension than the CS group. Compared to the OH and NMS groups, the US group had a higher incidence of carotid plaques and greater carotid intima-media thickness, respectively. The microbiota differed significantly between the US and CS groups, but not between the US group and the OH or NMS group.

Conclusions: We observed significant differences in the gut microbiota between CS and US. Future studies are necessary to evaluate the involvement of the gut microbiota in the complex pathogenesis of syncope and whether its analysis could support the interpretation of the pathophysiological mechasnisms underlying some episodes classifiable as US.

Citing Articles

Intestinal Insights: The Gut Microbiome's Role in Atherosclerotic Disease: A Narrative Review.

Alexandrescu L, Suceveanu A, Stanigut A, Tofolean D, Axelerad A, Iordache I Microorganisms. 2024; 12(11).

PMID: 39597729 PMC: 11596410. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12112341.


A Metabolomic Approach to Unexplained Syncope.

Longo S, Cicalini I, Pieragostino D, De Laurenzi V, Legramante J, Menghini R Biomedicines. 2024; 12(11).

PMID: 39595205 PMC: 11591916. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12112641.

References
1.
Stein J, Korcarz C, Hurst R, Lonn E, Kendall C, Mohler E . Use of carotid ultrasound to identify subclinical vascular disease and evaluate cardiovascular disease risk: a consensus statement from the American Society of Echocardiography Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Task Force. Endorsed by the Society for.... J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008; 21(2):93-111. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2007.11.011. View

2.
Fernandez G, Lee J, Liu L, Gassler J . The Baroreflex in Hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2015; 17(3):19. DOI: 10.1007/s11906-014-0531-z. View

3.
Krahn A, Klein G, Yee R, Hoch J, Skanes A . Cost implications of testing strategy in patients with syncope: randomized assessment of syncope trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 42(3):495-501. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00659-4. View

4.
Goldberger Z, Petek B, Brignole M, Shen W, Sheldon R, Solbiati M . ACC/AHA/HRS Versus ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Syncope: JACC Guideline Comparison. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 74(19):2410-2423. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.012. View

5.
Brignole M, Moya A, de Lange F, Deharo J, Elliott P, Fanciulli A . 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope. Eur Heart J. 2018; 39(21):1883-1948. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy037. View