» Articles » PMID: 38396061

Risk Factors of Recurrence After Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Solitary Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Feb 23
PMID 38396061
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To evaluate the recurrence rate and risk factors of recurrence after robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for solitary renal cell carcinoma (RCC). A total of 1265 cases of initial solitary localized RCC were analyzed. The baseline characteristics, complexity (REANL nephrometry score), intra- and peri-operative outcomes, and recurrence were evaluated. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate the factors affecting recurrence after RAPN for solitary localized RCC. Recurrence after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) occurred in 29 patients (2.29%). The median follow-up was 36.0 months. The N domain (nearness to collecting system/sinus) (odd ratio (OR) 3.517, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.557-7.945, p = 0.002), operation time (OR 1.005, 95% CI 1.001-1.010, p = 0.013), and perioperative transfusion (OR 5.450, 95% CI 1.197-24.816, p = 0.028) affected recurrence. Distant metastasis among patients with recurrence was significantly associated with nearness to the collecting system/sinus (OR 2.982, 95% CI 1.162-7.656, p = 0.023) and distance between the mass and collecting system/sinus (OR 0.758, 95% CI 0.594-0.967, p = 0.026). Nearness to the collecting system/sinus, operation time, and perioperative transfusion affect recurrence after RAPN for solitary localized RCC. Moreover, the proximity to the collecting system/sinus and distance between the mass and collecting system/sinus were significantly related to distant metastasis after RAPN.

Citing Articles

MiR-501-3p/SPC24 axis affects cell proliferation, migration, invasion, apoptosis, and prognosis in renal cell carcinoma.

Liang A, Huang J, He X, Tang X, Xu X, Chen M Braz J Med Biol Res. 2025; 58:e13507.

PMID: 39907402 PMC: 11793156. DOI: 10.1590/1414-431X2024e13507.

References
1.
Ristau B, Handorf E, Cahn D, Kutikov A, Uzzo R, Smaldone M . Partial nephrectomy is not associated with an overall survival advantage over radical nephrectomy in elderly patients with stage Ib-II renal masses: An analysis of the national cancer data base. Cancer. 2018; 124(19):3839-3848. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31582. View

2.
Kunath F, Schmidt S, Krabbe L, Miernik A, Dahm P, Cleves A . Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 5:CD012045. PMC: 6481491. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012045.pub2. View

3.
Miller D, Hollingsworth J, Hafez K, Daignault S, Hollenbeck B . Partial nephrectomy for small renal masses: an emerging quality of care concern?. J Urol. 2006; 175(3 Pt 1):853-7. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00422-2. View

4.
Joshi S, Uzzo R . Renal Tumor Anatomic Complexity: Clinical Implications for Urologists. Urol Clin North Am. 2017; 44(2):179-187. DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2016.12.004. View

5.
Khalifeh A, Kaouk J, Bhayani S, Rogers C, Stifelman M, Tanagho Y . Positive surgical margins in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional analysis of oncologic outcomes (leave no tumor behind). J Urol. 2013; 190(5):1674-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.110. View