» Articles » PMID: 35503118

Surgical Margins After Partial Nephrectomy As Prognostic Factor for the Risk of Local Recurrence in PT1 RCC: a Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis

Overview
Journal World J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2022 May 3
PMID 35503118
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To systematically review the published literature on surgical margins as a risk factor for local recurrence (LR) in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy (PN) for pT1 renal cell carcinomas (RCC).

Evidence Acquisition: A systematic literature search of relevant databases (MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library) was performed according to the PRISMA criteria up to February 2022. The hypothesis was developed using the PPO method (Patients = patients with pT1 RCC undergoing PN, Prognostic factor = positive surgical margins (PSM) detected on final pathology versus negative surgical margins (NSM) and Outcome = LR diagnosed on follow-up imaging). The primary outcome was the rate of PSM and LR. The risk of bias was assessed by the QUIPS tool.

Evidence Synthesis: After assessing 1525 abstracts and 409 full-text articles, eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The percentage of PSM ranged between 0 and 34.3%. In these patients with PSM, LR varied between 0 and 9.1%, whereas only 0-1.5% of LR were found in the NSM-group. The calculated odds ratio (95% confident intervals) varied between 0.04 [0.00-0.79] and 0.27 [0.01-4.76] and was statistically significant in two studies (0.14 [0.02-0.80] and 0.04 [0.00-0.79]). The quality analysis of the included studies resulted in an overall intermediate to high risk of bias and the level of evidence was overall very low. A meta-analysis was considered unsuitable due to the high heterogeneity between the included studies.

Conclusion: PSM after PN in patients with pT1 RCC is associated with a higher risk of LR. However, the evidence has significant limitations and caution should be taken with the interpretation of this data.

Citing Articles

Predicting Bleeding Related Events in Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Angiomyolipoma: Simplifying Risk Assessment with Tumor Diameter and Depth, A Retrospective Study.

Chen M, Chang Y, Sheng T, Huang L, Kan H, Liu C Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2024; 20:883-892.

PMID: 39726732 PMC: 11669544. DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S472180.


Exploring the Role of Intracorporeal Ultrasound in Partial Nephrectomies: A Systematic Review.

Mohsin M, Jess R, Abdulrasheed H, Almedej H, Osman B, Gaballa N Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e73293.

PMID: 39524170 PMC: 11549963. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.73293.


The Prognostic Impact of the Surgical Margin in Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Partial Nephrectomy: A Multi-Center Study.

Mosholt K, Aagaard M, Roder A, Azawi N Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(8).

PMID: 38672530 PMC: 11048438. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081449.


Risk factors of recurrence after robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for solitary localized renal cell carcinoma.

Chung J, Song W, Kang M, Sung H, Jeon H, Jeong B Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):4481.

PMID: 38396061 PMC: 10891047. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-51070-8.


Gross Hematuria Does not Affect the Selection of Nephrectomy Types for Clinical Stage 1 Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study.

Xing Z, Xu H, Ai K, Deng H, Hong Y, Deng P Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 31(5):3531-3543.

PMID: 38329657 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-14958-x.


References
1.
Isharwal S, Ye W, Wang A, Abraham J, Zabell J, Dong W . Impact of Comorbidities on Functional Recovery from Partial Nephrectomy. J Urol. 2017; 199(6):1433-1439. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.12.004. View

2.
Ljungberg B, Bedke J, Capitanio U, Bex A . Reply to Yongbao Wei, Ruochen Zhang, and Le Lin's Letter to the Editor re: Börje Ljungberg, Laurence Albiges, Yasmin Abu-Ghanem, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2022 Update. Eur Urol. 2022;82:e88. Eur Urol. 2022; 82(4):e111-e112. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.06.008. View

3.
Kreshover J, Richstone L, Kavoussi L . Renal cell recurrence for T1 tumors after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2013; 27(12):1468-70. DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0197. View

4.
Jang W, Shin S, Yoon C, Kim M, Kang D, Kang Y . Prognostic Significance of the Proportion of Ductal Component in Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate. J Urol. 2016; 197(4):1048-1053. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.11.104. View

5.
Eggener S, Yossepowitch O, Kundu S, Motzer R, Russo P . Risk score and metastasectomy independently impact prognosis of patients with recurrent renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2008; 180(3):873-8. PMC: 2570431. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.006. View