» Articles » PMID: 38391077

Background Factors Affecting the Radiation Exposure of the Lens of the Eye Among Nurses in Interventional Radiology: A Quantitative Observational Study

Overview
Journal Nurs Rep
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Nursing
Date 2024 Feb 23
PMID 38391077
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With the International Commission on Radiological Protection's (ICRP) reduction in the radiation dose threshold for cataracts, evaluating and preventing radiation exposure to the lens of the eye among interventional radiology (IR) staff have become urgent tasks. In this study, we focused on differences in lens-equivalent dose (H) to which IR nurses in three hospitals were exposed and aimed to identify factors underlying these differences. According to analyses of time-, distance-, and shielding-related factors, the magnitude of the H dose to which IR nurses were exposed could be explained not by time or shielding but by the distance between the X-ray exposure field and the location of the IR nurse. This distance tended to be shorter in hospitals with fewer staff. The most effective means of reducing the exposure of the lenses of IR nurses' eyes to radiation is to position them at least two meters from the radiation source during angiography procedures. However, some hospitals must provide IR departments with comparatively few staff. In work environments where it is infeasible to reduce exposure by increasing distance, interventions to reduce time by managing working practices and investment in shielding equipment are also important. This study was not registered.

Citing Articles

Influence of Hospital Bed Count on the Positioning of Cardiovascular Interventional Radiology (IR) Nurses: Online Questionnaire Survey of Japanese IR-Specialized Radiological Technologists.

Kuriyama T, Moritake T, Hitomi G, Nakagami K, Morota K, Matsuzaki S Nurs Rep. 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39852633 PMC: 11767440. DOI: 10.3390/nursrep15010011.

References
1.
MERRIAM Jr G . A clinical study of radiation cataracts. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1956; 54:611-53. PMC: 1312651. View

2.
Sailer A, Schurink G, Bol M, de Haan M, van Zwam W, Wildberger J . Occupational Radiation Exposure During Endovascular Aortic Repair. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014; 38(4):827-32. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-014-1025-8. View

3.
Sanchez R, Vano E, Fernandez J, Pifarre X, Ordiales J, Rovira J . Occupational eye lens doses in interventional cardiology. A multicentric study. J Radiol Prot. 2016; 36(1):133-43. DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/36/1/133. View

4.
Martin C, Magee J . Assessment of eye and body dose for interventional radiologists, cardiologists, and other interventional staff. J Radiol Prot. 2013; 33(2):445-60. DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/33/2/445. View

5.
Furst C, SMILEY W, ANSELL B . Steroid cataract. Ann Rheum Dis. 1966; 25(4):364-8. PMC: 2453341. DOI: 10.1136/ard.25.4.364. View