» Articles » PMID: 38390732

Privacy-proof Live Surgery Streaming: Development and Validation of a Low-cost, Real-time Robotic Surgery Anonymization Algorithm

Abstract

Objective: Develop a pioneer surgical anonymization algorithm for reliable and accurate real-time removal of out-of-body images validated across various robotic platforms.

Background: The use of surgical video data has become a common practice in enhancing research and training. Video sharing requires complete anonymization, which, in the case of endoscopic surgery, entails the removal of all nonsurgical video frames where the endoscope can record the patient or operating room staff. To date, no openly available algorithmic solution for surgical anonymization offers reliable real-time anonymization for video streaming, which is also robotic-platform and procedure-independent.

Methods: A data set of 63 surgical videos of 6 procedures performed on four robotic systems was annotated for out-of-body sequences. The resulting 496.828 images were used to develop a deep learning algorithm that automatically detected out-of-body frames. Our solution was subsequently benchmarked against existing anonymization methods. In addition, we offer a postprocessing step to enhance the performance and test a low-cost setup for real-time anonymization during live surgery streaming.

Results: Framewise anonymization yielded a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve score of 99.46% on unseen procedures, increasing to 99.89% after postprocessing. Our Robotic Anonymization Network outperforms previous state-of-the-art algorithms, even on unseen procedural types, despite the fact that alternative solutions are explicitly trained using these procedures.

Conclusions: Our deep learning model, Robotic Anonymization Network, offers reliable, accurate, and safe real-time anonymization during complex and lengthy surgical procedures regardless of the robotic platform. The model can be used in real time for surgical live streaming and is openly available.

References
1.
De Backer P, Lores M, Demuynck M, Piramide F, Simoens J, Oosterlinck T . Surgical Phase Duration in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Surgical Data Science Exploration for Clinical Relevance. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(21). PMC: 10650909. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13213386. View

2.
Thomas B, Slack M, Hussain M, Barber N, Pradhan A, Dinneen E . Preclinical Evaluation of the Versius Surgical System, a New Robot-assisted Surgical Device for Use in Minimal Access Renal and Prostate Surgery. Eur Urol Focus. 2020; 7(2):444-452. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.01.011. View

3.
Schulze A, Tran D, Daum M, Kisilenko A, Maier-Hein L, Speidel S . Ensuring privacy protection in the era of big laparoscopic video data: development and validation of an inside outside discrimination algorithm (IODA). Surg Endosc. 2023; 37(8):6153-6162. PMC: 10338566. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10078-x. View

4.
De Backer P, Eckhoff J, Simoens J, Muller D, Allaeys C, Creemers H . Multicentric exploration of tool annotation in robotic surgery: lessons learned when starting a surgical artificial intelligence project. Surg Endosc. 2022; 36(11):8533-8548. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09487-1. View

5.
Kaouk J, Garisto J, Bertolo R . Robotic Urologic Surgical Interventions Performed with the Single Port Dedicated Platform: First Clinical Investigation. Eur Urol. 2018; 75(4):684-691. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.044. View