» Articles » PMID: 37516693

SAGES Consensus Recommendations on Surgical Video Data Use, Structure, and Exploration (for Research in Artificial Intelligence, Clinical Quality Improvement, and Surgical Education)

Abstract

Background: Surgery generates a vast amount of data from each procedure. Particularly video data provides significant value for surgical research, clinical outcome assessment, quality control, and education. The data lifecycle is influenced by various factors, including data structure, acquisition, storage, and sharing; data use and exploration, and finally data governance, which encompasses all ethical and legal regulations associated with the data. There is a universal need among stakeholders in surgical data science to establish standardized frameworks that address all aspects of this lifecycle to ensure data quality and purpose.

Methods: Working groups were formed, among 48 representatives from academia and industry, including clinicians, computer scientists and industry representatives. These working groups focused on: Data Use, Data Structure, Data Exploration, and Data Governance. After working group and panel discussions, a modified Delphi process was conducted.

Results: The resulting Delphi consensus provides conceptualized and structured recommendations for each domain related to surgical video data. We identified the key stakeholders within the data lifecycle and formulated comprehensive, easily understandable, and widely applicable guidelines for data utilization. Standardization of data structure should encompass format and quality, data sources, documentation, metadata, and account for biases within the data. To foster scientific data exploration, datasets should reflect diversity and remain adaptable to future applications. Data governance must be transparent to all stakeholders, addressing legal and ethical considerations surrounding the data.

Conclusion: This consensus presents essential recommendations around the generation of standardized and diverse surgical video databanks, accounting for multiple stakeholders involved in data generation and use throughout its lifecycle. Following the SAGES annotation framework, we lay the foundation for standardization of data use, structure, and exploration. A detailed exploration of requirements for adequate data governance will follow.

Citing Articles

Robotic-assisted surgery in the Arab world: are we there yet?.

Azhar R, Saikali S, Jaber A, Gamal A, Aboumarzouk O, Abdelhakim M J Robot Surg. 2025; 19(1):95.

PMID: 40032660 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-02260-1.


Leveraging data science and AI to democratize global surgical expertise.

Cheikh Youssef S, Dasgupta P, Haram M, Hachach-Haram N BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2024; 6(1):e000334.

PMID: 39659515 PMC: 11628981. DOI: 10.1136/bmjsit-2024-000334.


Consensus for Operating Room Multimodal Data Management: Identifying Research Priorities for Data-Driven Surgery.

Garcia Vazquez A, Verde J, Hernandez Lara A, Mutter D, Swanstrom L Ann Surg Open. 2024; 5(3):e459.

PMID: 39310343 PMC: 11415082. DOI: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000459.


Adoption of routine surgical video recording: a nationwide freedom of information act request across England and Wales.

Yiu A, Lam K, Simister C, Clarke J, Kinross J EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 70:102545.

PMID: 38685926 PMC: 11056472. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102545.


Privacy-proof Live Surgery Streaming: Development and Validation of a Low-cost, Real-time Robotic Surgery Anonymization Algorithm.

De Backer P, Simoens J, Mestdagh K, Hofman J, Eckhoff J, Jobczyk M Ann Surg. 2024; 280(1):13-20.

PMID: 38390732 PMC: 11161223. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006245.


References
1.
Meireles O, Rosman G, Altieri M, Carin L, Hager G, Madani A . SAGES consensus recommendations on an annotation framework for surgical video. Surg Endosc. 2021; 35(9):4918-4929. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08578-9. View

2.
Yang J, Goodman E, Dawes A, Gahagan J, Esquivel M, Liebert C . Using AI and computer vision to analyze technical proficiency in robotic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2022; 37(4):3010-3017. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09781-y. View

3.
Bhatti K, Khanzada Z, Kuzman M, Ali S, Iftikhar S, Small P . Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence-Based Models for the Detection of Early Esophageal Cancers in Barret's Esophagus: A Meta-Analysis of Patient-Based Studies. Cureus. 2021; 13(6):e15447. PMC: 8255083. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.15447. View

4.
Dennler C, Bauer D, Scheibler A, Spirig J, Gotschi T, Furnstahl P . Augmented reality in the operating room: a clinical feasibility study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1):451. PMC: 8132365. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04339-w. View

5.
Kennedy-Metz L, Mascagni P, Torralba A, Dias R, Perona P, Shah J . Computer Vision in the Operating Room: Opportunities and Caveats. IEEE Trans Med Robot Bionics. 2021; 3(1):2-10. PMC: 7908934. DOI: 10.1109/tmrb.2020.3040002. View