» Articles » PMID: 38379326

Prognostic Implications of HER2NEU-low in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Overview
Journal Cancer Med
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Feb 21
PMID 38379326
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: We explored characteristics and clinical outcomes of HER2-negative and HER2-low metastatic breast cancers using real-world data.

Methods: We queried the National Cancer Database to identify MBC patients that were HER2-low or HER2-negative per immunohistochemical staining. A binomial regression analysis identified demographic and clinical correlates of each subtype. A Cox multivariable regression analysis (MVA) and propensity-match analysis were performed to identify correlates of survival.

Results: Excluding missing data, 24,636 MBC patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2015 were identified; 27.9% were HER2-negative and 72.1% were HER2-low. There were no relevant demographic differences between the groups. HER2-low tumors were half as likely to have concomitant hormone receptor-positive status (p < 0.01). The 3-year survival rate among hormone receptor-negative patients was 33.8% for HER2-low and 32.2% for HER2-negative (p < 0.05), and 60.9% and 55.6% in HER2-low and HER2-negative cases among hormone receptor-positive patients (p < 0.05), respectively. HER2-low cases were associated with better survival on MVA (HR =0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.99) and remained superior with propensity-matching (HR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.89-0.96). In a subset analysis isolated to hormone receptor-positive cases, HER2-low remained correlated with improved survival (HR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.89-0.98) with propensity-matched MVA. Correlates of worse survival include older age as a continuous variable (HR = 1.02, 95% CI 1.02-1.02) and Black race (HR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.20-1.32) [all p < 0.01].

Conclusions: In the largest such analysis performed to date, our study demonstrates a small but statistically significant association with improved survival for HER2-low tumors compared to HER2-negative tumors in MBC.

Citing Articles

Prognostic implications of HER2NEU-low in metastatic breast cancer.

Neubauer Z, Hasan S, Press R, Chhabra A, Fox J, Bakst R Cancer Med. 2024; 13(2):e6979.

PMID: 38379326 PMC: 10839127. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6979.


The association between HER2-low status and survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with Cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Guven D, Sahin T Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024; 204(3):443-452.

PMID: 38240935 PMC: 10959779. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07226-1.


Prognostic value of HER2-low status in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Molinelli C, Jacobs F, Agostinetto E, Nader-Marta G, Ceppi M, Bruzzone M ESMO Open. 2023; 8(4):101592.

PMID: 37413762 PMC: 10485402. DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101592.


The association between HER2-low expression and prognosis of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tang Y, Shen G, Xin Y, Li Z, Zheng Y, Wang M Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2023; 15:17588359231156669.

PMID: 36872948 PMC: 9983100. DOI: 10.1177/17588359231156669.

References
1.
Krop I, LoRusso P, Miller K, Modi S, Yardley D, Rodriguez G . A phase II study of trastuzumab emtansine in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer who were previously treated with trastuzumab, lapatinib, an anthracycline, a taxane, and capecitabine. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(26):3234-41. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.5902. View

2.
Rosso C, Voutsadakis I . Characteristics, Clinical Differences and Outcomes of Breast Cancer Patients with Negative or Low HER2 Expression. Clin Breast Cancer. 2022; 22(4):391-397. DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.02.008. View

3.
Huang H, Smart M, Zolekar A, Deng H, Hubbard C, Hoskins K . Impact of socioeconomic status and rurality on cancer-specific survival among women with de novo metastatic breast cancer by race/ethnicity. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022; 193(3):707-716. PMC: 10224670. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06603-6. View

4.
Verma V, Surkar S, Moreno A, Lin C, Simone 2nd C . Practice patterns and outcomes of chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for older patients with nasopharyngeal cancer. Cancer Med. 2018; 7(5):1604-1611. PMC: 5943491. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1290. View

5.
DAgostino Jr R . Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998; 17(19):2265-81. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2265::aid-sim918>3.0.co;2-b. View