» Articles » PMID: 38376090

Digital Alcohol and Cannabis Ads, Consumption Frequency, and Driving Under the Influence

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2024 Feb 20
PMID 38376090
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Little is known about the consequences of substance-related advertising on driving under the influence of alcohol (DUIA) or cannabis (DUIC). This study seeks to estimate associations between substance-related digital advertising exposures and DUIA and DUIC in a sample of young adults.

Method: The Rhode Island Young Adult Survey 2022 was a cross-sectional web-based survey of 1,022 adults ages 18-25 years. Analyses were conducted among lifetime alcohol users ( = 824) and lifetime cannabis users ( = 471). Prevalence of past-30-day digital ad exposure to alcohol and cannabis was assessed, as well as the prevalence of past-month DUIA and DUIC. Multivariable logistic regressions examined the association between digital ad exposure and substance use among lifetime users, and ad exposure and DUI among current users.

Results: In all, 54.4% of participants reported past-30-day exposure to digital alcohol advertising, and 33.5% reported exposure to digital cannabis advertising. Exposure to social media alcohol advertising was associated with higher odds of DUIA after adjustment for sociodemographic variables (odds ratio [95% CI] = 2.14 [1.07, 4.28]) but not after accounting for frequency of use. Odds of DUIC remained significantly higher for those exposed to app-based cannabis advertising after adjusting for sociodemographic variables (odds ratio [95% CI] = 4.36 [1.76, 10.8]) and frequency of use (odds ratio [95% CI] = 3.96 [1.53, 10.2]).

Conclusions: Since social media alcohol ad exposure may be indirectly linked with DUIA, and app-based cannabis ad exposure may be directly linked to frequency of use and DUIC, legislators should consider comprehensive substance-related ad regulations and bans.

References
1.
Carlini B, Garrett S, Firth C, Pinsky I . Cannabis Industry Marketing Violations in Washington State, 2014-2019. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2022; 83(1):18-26. View

2.
Buchanan L, Kelly B, Yeatman H, Kariippanon K . The Effects of Digital Marketing of Unhealthy Commodities on Young People: A Systematic Review. Nutrients. 2018; 10(2). PMC: 5852724. DOI: 10.3390/nu10020148. View

3.
Ghassemlou S, Marini C, Chemi C, Ranjit Y, Tofighi B . Harmful smartphone applications promoting alcohol and illicit substance use: a review and content analysis in the United States. Transl Behav Med. 2020; 10(5):1233-1242. PMC: 7899440. DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibz135. View

4.
West J, Burt K, Klemperer E, Chen H, Villanti A . Latent Classes of Perceived Addictiveness Predict Marijuana, Alcohol, and Tobacco Use in Youth and Young Adults. Subst Use Misuse. 2023; 58(3):454-464. PMC: 10227722. DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2167497. View

5.
Noel J, Babor T . Does industry self-regulation protect young people from exposure to alcohol marketing? A review of compliance and complaint studies. Addiction. 2016; 112 Suppl 1:51-56. DOI: 10.1111/add.13432. View