» Articles » PMID: 31391789

Participation with Alcohol Marketing and User-created Promotion on Social Media, and the Association with Higher-risk Alcohol Consumption and Brand Identification Among Adolescents in the UK

Overview
Date 2019 Aug 9
PMID 31391789
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To explore participation with alcohol marketing (i.e. commenting on brand statuses) and user-created promotion on social media (i.e. photos of peers drinking) by young people in the United Kingdom (UK), and what association this has with higher-risk consumption and brand identification. Online cross-sectional survey with 11-19-year olds in the UK ( = 3,399) (average age: 15 years old). Past-month participation was measured for five forms of alcohol marketing on social media and one form of user-created promotion (all Yes/No). Past-month awareness of nine wider alcohol marketing activities, social media apps used at least weekly, and ownership of branded merchandise were included as covariates. Outcomes included higher-risk consumption in current drinkers (≥5 AUDIT-C) and brand identification in all respondents (8 pictures with brand names removed). Over one-in-ten respondents (13.2%) had participated with at least one form of marketing on social media or participated with user-created promotion (12.2%). For both, participation was greater in current drinkers and those of legal purchasing age. A logistic regression found that participation with two or more forms of marketing on social media ( = 1.96,  < .01) and participation with user-created promotion ( = 3.46,  < .001) were associated with higher-risk drinking. Respondents, on average, identified 2.58 ( = 2.12) alcohol brands. A linear regression found participation with marketing on social media was not associated with brand identification ( = 0.01,  = .42) but participation with user-created promotion was ( = 0.05,  < .001). Social media provides opportunities for adolescents to participate with commercial marketing and user-created promotion and this is associated with higher-risk consumption and brand identification.

Citing Articles

#Bartender: portrayals of popular alcohol influencer's videos on TikTok.

Guegan E, Zenone M, Mialon M, Gallopel-Morvan K BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):1384.

PMID: 38783213 PMC: 11112761. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18571-1.


Digital Alcohol and Cannabis Ads, Consumption Frequency, and Driving Under the Influence.

Noel J, Rosenthal S, Edwards Z, Palmieri K J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2024; 85(4):468-476.

PMID: 38376090 PMC: 11289870. DOI: 10.15288/jsad.23-00319.


Effectiveness of Regulatory Policies on Online/Digital/Internet-Mediated Alcohol Marketing: a Systematic Review.

Rados Krnel S, Levicnik G, van Dalen W, Ferrarese G, Tricas-Sauras S J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2023; 13(1):115-128.

PMID: 36732366 PMC: 10006384. DOI: 10.1007/s44197-023-00088-2.


Underage Adolescents' Reactions to Adverts for Beer and Spirit Brands and Associations with Higher Risk Drinking and Susceptibility to Drink: A Cross-Sectional Study in the UK.

Boniface S, Critchlow N, Severi K, MacKintosh A, Hooper L, Thomas C Alcohol Alcohol. 2021; 57(3):347-356.

PMID: 33887764 PMC: 9086752. DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agab018.


Social Media Use and Mental Health and Well-Being Among Adolescents - A Scoping Review.

Schonning V, Hjetland G, Aaro L, Skogen J Front Psychol. 2020; 11:1949.

PMID: 32922333 PMC: 7457037. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01949.


References
1.
Caroll T, Donovan R . Alcohol marketing on the internet: new challenges for harm reduction. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2002; 21(1):83-91. DOI: 10.1080/09595230220119381. View

2.
Henriksen L, Feighery E, Schleicher N, Fortmann S . Receptivity to alcohol marketing predicts initiation of alcohol use. J Adolesc Health. 2007; 42(1):28-35. PMC: 2175037. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.07.005. View

3.
Anderson P, de Bruijn A, Angus K, Gordon R, Hastings G . Impact of alcohol advertising and media exposure on adolescent alcohol use: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Alcohol Alcohol. 2009; 44(3):229-43. DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agn115. View

4.
Griffiths R, Casswell S . Intoxigenic digital spaces? Youth, social networking sites and alcohol marketing. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2010; 29(5):525-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00178.x. View

5.
Gordon R . An audit of alcohol brand websites. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2011; 30(6):638-44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00257.x. View