Using a Combination of Superb Microvascular Imaging and Other Auxiliary Ultrasound Techniques to Increase the Accuracy of Gray-scale Ultrasound for Breast Masses

Overview

Journal BMC Cancer

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Oncology

Date 2024 Feb 16

PMID 38365653

Authors

Mahboubeh Abedi

Leyla Sahebi

Bita Eslami

Azin Saberi

Marzieh Orouji

Sadaf Alipour

Shirin Shahsavarhaghighi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Breast ultrasound is highly sensitive, but its specificity is not as high for detecting malignant lesions. Auxiliary modalities like elastography, Color and Power Doppler ultrasound are used as adjuncts to yield both a high sensitivity and specificity. Superb microvascular imaging (SMI) is a newer modality with more accuracy for detecting breast lesions. In this study, our goal was to investigate the role of SMI as an adjunct to ultrasound and find a suitable combination model for the evaluation of breast masses.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 132 women with 172 breast masses who underwent ultrasound-guided biopsy were included.. The ultrasound features of the lesion, the strain ratio in strain elastography, the number of vessels for each lesion, their morphology and distribution in Doppler and Power Doppler ultrasound and SMI were recorded for each lesion. A vascular score and a vascular ratio were defined.

Results: In the histologic examination, 31 lesions (18%) were malignant and 141 lesions (82%) were benign. The vascular score was more accurate than the vascular ratio in all three modalities. The predictive ability of strain ratio was higher than Doppler and Power Doppler ultrasound and SMI. Adding SMI alone to ultrasound increased the specificity from 46.10% to 61.2% and the accuracy from 55.80% to 70.11%. In the combination of ultrasound with other modalities, the best was the combination of ultrasound, strain elastography, and SMI; which yielded a specificity and sensitivity of 100% and 74.4%, respectively.

Conclusion: Adding SMI and STE modalities as adjuncts to ultrasound lowers the chance of missing malignant lesions and reduces unnecessary biopsies of breast lesions. A study with a larger sample size using this combination model to evaluate the accuracy with greater precision is recommended.

References

Lee E, Chang Y . Combination of Quantitative Parameters of Shear Wave Elastography and Superb Microvascular Imaging to Evaluate Breast Masses. Korean J Radiol. 2020; 21(9):1045-1054. PMC: 7371619. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0765. View

Uysal E, Ozturk M, Kilincer A, Koplay M . Comparison of the Effectiveness of Shear Wave Elastography and Superb Microvascular Imaging in the Evaluation of Breast Masses. Ultrasound Q. 2021; 37(2):191-197. DOI: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000562. View

Zhong L, Wang C . Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound superb microvascular imaging for breast tumor: a meta-analysis. Med Ultrason. 2020; 22(3):313-318. DOI: 10.11152/mu-2460. View

Park A, Seo B, Woo O, Jung K, Cho K, Park E . The utility of ultrasound superb microvascular imaging for evaluation of breast tumour vascularity: comparison with colour and power Doppler imaging regarding diagnostic performance. Clin Radiol. 2017; 73(3):304-311. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.10.006. View

Feng J, Lu J, Jin C, Chen Y, Chen S, Guo G . Diagnostic Value of Superb Microvascular Imaging in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(11). PMC: 9689350. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12112648. View

Zhou Y, Wu J . Which combination of different ultrasonography modalities is more appropriate to diagnose breast cancer?: A network meta-analysis (a PRISMA-compliant article). Medicine (Baltimore). 2022; 101(31):e29955. PMC: 9351919. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029955. View

Chae E, Yoon G, Cha J, Shin H, Choi W, Kim H . Added Value of the Vascular Index on Superb Microvascular Imaging for the Evaluation of Breast Masses: Comparison With Grayscale Ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med. 2020; 40(4):715-723. DOI: 10.1002/jum.15441. View

Milz P, Lienemann A, Kessler M, Reiser M . Evaluation of breast lesions by power Doppler sonography. Eur Radiol. 2001; 11(4):547-54. DOI: 10.1007/s003300000733. View

Ma Y, Li G, Li J, Ren W . The Diagnostic Value of Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) in Detecting Blood Flow Signals of Breast Lesions: A Preliminary Study Comparing SMI to Color Doppler Flow Imaging. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015; 94(36):e1502. PMC: 4616654. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001502. View

10.

Banerjee S, Dowsett M, Ashworth A, Martin L . Mechanisms of disease: angiogenesis and the management of breast cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2007; 4(9):536-50. DOI: 10.1038/ncponc0905. View

11.

Tan P, Ellis I, Allison K, Brogi E, Fox S, Lakhani S . The 2019 World Health Organization classification of tumours of the breast. Histopathology. 2020; 77(2):181-185. DOI: 10.1111/his.14091. View

12.

Kim E, Seo B, Park E, Woo O, Jung K, Cho K . Significance of microvascular evaluation of ductal lesions on breast ultrasonography: Influence on diagnostic performance. Clin Imaging. 2018; 51:252-259. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.05.024. View

13.

Zhu Y, Zu D, Zhang Y, Shan J, Shi X, Deng S . A comparative study on superb microvascular imaging and conventional ultrasonography in differentiating BI-RADS 4 breast lesions. Oncol Lett. 2019; 18(3):3202-3210. PMC: 6676576. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.10603. View

14.

Liang M, Ou B, Wu J, Xiao X, Ruan J, Tian J . Combined use of strain elastography and superb microvascular imaging with grayscale ultrasound according to the BI-RADS classification for differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2019; 74(4):391-403. DOI: 10.3233/CH-190693. View

15.

Zhu Y, Zhang Y, Deng S, Jiang Q . Diagnostic Performance of Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) Combined with Shear-Wave Elastography in Evaluating Breast Lesions. Med Sci Monit. 2018; 24:5935-5942. PMC: 6122269. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.910399. View

16.

Liu B, Zheng Y, Huang G, Lin M, Shan Q, Lu Y . Breast Lesions: Quantitative Diagnosis Using Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography-A Systematic Review and Meta--Analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016; 42(4):835-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.10.024. View

17.

Carmeliet P, Jain R . Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases. Nature. 2000; 407(6801):249-57. DOI: 10.1038/35025220. View

18.

Diao X, Zhan J, Chen L, Chen Y, Cao H . Role of Superb Microvascular Imaging in Differentiating Between Malignant and Benign Solid Breast Masses. Clin Breast Cancer. 2020; 20(6):e786-e793. DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2020.06.009. View

19.

Zhan J, Diao X, Jin J, Chen L, Chen Y . Superb Microvascular Imaging-A new vascular detecting ultrasonographic technique for avascular breast masses: A preliminary study. Eur J Radiol. 2016; 85(5):915-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.12.011. View

20.

Lee S, Choi H, Baek S, Lim S . Role of color and power doppler imaging in differentiating between malignant and benign solid breast masses. J Clin Ultrasound. 2002; 30(8):459-64. DOI: 10.1002/jcu.10100. View