» Articles » PMID: 38354744

[Redirection of Patients from the Emergency Department to Ambulatory Care: a Feasibility Study]

Overview
Publisher Thieme
Specialty Public Health
Date 2024 Feb 14
PMID 38354744
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: § 120 para. 3b SGB V mandates the Federal Joint Committee to define guidelines for the initial assessment of self-referred walk-in patients as well as for the redirection of patients who can be treated by office-based physicians. A corresponding streaming and redirection process was tested in a feasibility study at the RoMed Clinic Rosenheim.

Materials And Methods: For the duration of the study, triage nurses of the emergency department (ED) first assessed self-referred walk-in patients with the Manchester Triage System (MTS). Patients in categories green and blue who did not obviously need the ED's resources were additionally assessed by health professionals of the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians of Bavaria using the software Structured Initial Medical Assessment in Germany (SmED). Patients with a recommendation for non-hospital medical treatment were streamed to the out-of-hours practice on campus or were redirected to a physician office after video consultation with an office-based physician. Patient pathways were documented and a qualitative survey using semistructured guided interviews of all stakeholder groups was carried out.

Results: 1,091 self-referred walk-in patients were included. Direct streaming to the ED occurred in 525 cases,13 refused to participate. Based on SmED, 24 additional patients were referred to the ED, 514 patients were streamed to the out-of-hours practice, 23 received a video consultation and five left the ED. After video consultation, eight patients were redirected to a physician's office, 10 were discharged, and five referred to the ED of which one did not want an office-based physician. No returnees from practices to the ED were identified. Generally, the redirection process was evaluated positively in the interviews (n=18). In particular, potential for technical improvement was identified.

Conclusion: Overall, the results indicate the feasibility of the redirection process and high acceptance levels. Using SmED in addition to MTS appeared useful before redirection but not necessary for streaming on campus. Redirection to physician offices can help reduce strain on the ED when the out-of-hours practice is not operating. In addition to arranging acute care appointments, video consultations offer an additional potential to treat patients. In a follow-up study, a broader range of patients should be included and appropriateness of redirection decisions should be evaluated.

References
1.
Schmiedhofer M, Mockel M, Slagman A, Frick J, Ruhla S, Searle J . Patient motives behind low-acuity visits to the emergency department in Germany: a qualitative study comparing urban and rural sites. BMJ Open. 2016; 6(11):e013323. PMC: 5129074. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013323. View

2.
Vertesi L . Does the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale identify non-urgent patients who can be triaged away from the emergency department?. CJEM. 2007; 6(5):337-42. DOI: 10.1017/s1481803500009611. View

3.
van der Linden M, Lindeboom R, Van der Linden N, van den Brand C, Lam R, Lucas C . Self-referring patients at the emergency department: appropriateness of ED use and motives for self-referral. Int J Emerg Med. 2014; 7:28. PMC: 4110705. DOI: 10.1186/s12245-014-0028-1. View

4.
Cooper A, Davies F, Edwards M, Anderson P, Carson-Stevens A, Cooke M . The impact of general practitioners working in or alongside emergency departments: a rapid realist review. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(4):e024501. PMC: 6500276. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024501. View

5.
Pabst D, Schibensky J, Fistera D, Risse J, Kill C, Holzner C . [Risk management in the triage of emergency room patients to outpatient care : Manchester Triage System and CEReCo-blue as a tool for low-risk patient management in integrated emergency centers]. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2021; 117(6):410-418. PMC: 9452430. DOI: 10.1007/s00063-021-00853-w. View