» Articles » PMID: 27852722

Patient Motives Behind Low-acuity Visits to the Emergency Department in Germany: a Qualitative Study Comparing Urban and Rural Sites

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2016 Nov 18
PMID 27852722
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The increasing number of low-acuity visits to emergency departments (ED) is an important issue in Germany, despite the fact that all costs of inpatient and outpatient treatment are covered by mandatory health insurance. We aimed to explore the motives of patients categorised with low-acuity conditions for visiting an ED.

Methods: We conducted a qualitative study in two urban and one rural ED. We recruited a purposive sample of adults, who were assigned to the lowest two categories in the Manchester triage system. One-to-one interviews took place in the ED during patients' waiting time for treatment. Interview transcripts were analysed using the qualitative data management software MAXQDA. A qualitative content analysis approach was taken to identify motives and to compare the rural with the urban sites.

Results: A total of 86 patients were asked to participate; of these, n=15 declined participation and n=7 were excluded because they were admitted as inpatients, leaving a final sample of 40 female and 24 male patients. We identified three pathways leading to an ED visit: (1) without primary care contact, (2) after unsuccessful attempts to see a resident specialist or general practitioner (GP) and (3) recommendation to visit the ED by an outpatient provider. The two essential motives were (1) convenience and (2) health anxiety, triggered by time constraints and focused usage of multidisciplinary medical care in a highly equipped setting. All participants from the rural region were connected to a GP, whom they saw more or less regularly, while more interviewees from the urban site did not have a permanent GP. Still, motives to visit the ED were in general the same.

Conclusions: We conclude that the ED plays a pivotal role in ambulatory acute care which needs to be recognised for adequate resource allocation.

Trial Registration Number: DRK S00006053.

Citing Articles

Reasons for emergency department use of low-acuity attender: results from the prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional EPICS-9/PiNo-Bund study.

Slagman A, Schmiedhofer M, Legg D, Kruger D, Eienbroker L, Holert F BMJ Open. 2025; 15(3):e090681.

PMID: 40032406 PMC: 11877155. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090681.


Frequency, demographics, diagnoses and consultation patterns associated with low-acuity attendances in German emergency departments: a retrospective routine healthcare data analysis from the INDEED project.

Fischer-Rosinsky A, Slagman A, Legg D, Wu Y, King R, Roll S BMJ Open. 2025; 14(12):e084986.

PMID: 39806647 PMC: 11667451. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084986.


Establishing a telemedical supported trans-sectoral collaboration network from community support to emergency care for outpatient care recipients: study protocol of a prospective non-randomized complex intervention study with a pragmatic approach,....

Muller D, Jachan D, Stahl M, Rosenbusch M, Liersch-Mazan D, Lippert P BMC Geriatr. 2024; 24(1):987.

PMID: 39623305 PMC: 11610059. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05553-6.


Experiences of caregivers of patients with noncancer diseases readmitted to an emergency department at the end of life.

Amado-Tineo J, Oscanoa-Espinoza T, Loli-Ponce R, Delgado-Guay M BMC Palliat Care. 2024; 23(1):265.

PMID: 39548480 PMC: 11566118. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01596-z.


Evaluating Ocular Healthcare Accessibility and the Severity of Emergencies during Times of Crisis.

Neubauer J, Richter P, Strudel L, Ziemssen F, Dimopoulos S J Clin Med. 2024; 13(19).

PMID: 39408022 PMC: 11478193. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13195962.


References
1.
Lawson C, Carroll K, Gonzalez R, Priolo C, Apter A, Rhodes K . "No other choice": reasons for emergency department utilization among urban adults with acute asthma. Acad Emerg Med. 2014; 21(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1111/acem.12285. View

2.
Rising K, Hudgins A, Reigle M, Hollander J, Carr B . "I'm Just a Patient": Fear and Uncertainty as Drivers of Emergency Department Use in Patients With Chronic Disease. Ann Emerg Med. 2016; 68(5):536-543. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.03.053. View

3.
Choo E, Garro A, Ranney M, Meisel Z, Guthrie K . Qualitative Research in Emergency Care Part I: Research Principles and Common Applications. Acad Emerg Med. 2015; 22(9):1096-102. PMC: 4545270. DOI: 10.1111/acem.12736. View

4.
Pines J, Hilton J, Weber E, Alkemade A, Al Shabanah H, Anderson P . International perspectives on emergency department crowding. Acad Emerg Med. 2011; 18(12):1358-70. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01235.x. View

5.
Lowthian J, Smith C, Stoelwinder J, Smit D, McNeil J, Cameron P . Why older patients of lower clinical urgency choose to attend the emergency department. Intern Med J. 2012; 43(1):59-65. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2012.02842.x. View