» Articles » PMID: 38352703

The Effect of Sumac on Cardiometabolic Parameters in Adults: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview
Journal Front Nutr
Date 2024 Feb 14
PMID 38352703
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The current evidence on the effect of Sumac consumption on cardiovascular parameters has produced controversial findings.

Methods: We systematically searched several databases, including PubMed-Medline, SCOPUS, and ISI Web of Science, to find eligible studies until January 2023. Meta-analysis to calculated the weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95 %CI, Sub-group meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis were conducted throughout the study.

Results: 16 randomized controlled trials comprising a total number of 1,225 participants were included. The results of meta-analysis revealed that Sumac significantly affected low-density lipoprotein (WMD: -8.66 mg/dL; 95% CI: -14.2, -3.12), high-density lipoprotein (WMD: 3.15 mg/dL; 1.99,4.31), triglycerides (WMD: -11.96 mg/dL; -19.44, -4.48), fasting blood glucose (WMD: -4.15 mg/dL; -7.31, -0.98), insulin (WMD: -1.72; -3.18, -0.25), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR; WMD: -0.61; -1.22, -0.01), and anthropometric indices ( < 0.05). Moreover, the results significantly reduced total cholesterol when the intervention duration was ≥12 weeks (WMD: -8.58 mg/dL; -16.8, -0.37).

Conclusion: These findings suggest that Sumac is potentially an effective complementary intervention to improve cardiometabolic parameters. Thus, patients could utilize Sumac as part of their diet to improve their overall cardiometabolic status.

References
1.
Wang M, Wang B, Wang S, Lu H, Wu H, Ding M . Effect of Quercetin on Lipids Metabolism Through Modulating the Gut Microbial and AMPK/PPAR Signaling Pathway in Broilers. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021; 9:616219. PMC: 7900412. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.616219. View

2.
Duval S, Tweedie R . Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics. 2000; 56(2):455-63. DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x. View

3.
Eid H, Nachar A, Thong F, Sweeney G, Haddad P . The molecular basis of the antidiabetic action of quercetin in cultured skeletal muscle cells and hepatocytes. Pharmacogn Mag. 2015; 11(41):74-81. PMC: 4329636. DOI: 10.4103/0973-1296.149708. View

4.
Shidfar F, Rahideh S, Rajab A, Khandozi N, Hosseini S, Shidfar S . The Effect of Sumac (Rhus coriaria L.)Powder on Serum Glycemic Status, ApoB, ApoA-I and Total Antioxidant Capacity in Type 2 Diabetic Patients. Iran J Pharm Res. 2015; 13(4):1249-55. PMC: 4232791. View

5.
Ashrafizadeh M, Zarrabi A, Mirzaei S, Hashemi F, Samarghandian S, Zabolian A . Gallic acid for cancer therapy: Molecular mechanisms and boosting efficacy by nanoscopical delivery. Food Chem Toxicol. 2021; 157:112576. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112576. View