» Articles » PMID: 38352593

Basic or Adaptation: The Assessment and Heritability of a Brief Measure of Agency

Overview
Journal Res Sq
Date 2024 Feb 14
PMID 38352593
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The interpersonal circumplex describes two major axes of personality that guide much of social behavior. Agency, one half of the interpersonal circumplex, refers to relatively stable behavioral patterns that center on self-focused dominance and assertiveness. Past empirical work on agency tends to treat the dimension as a characteristic adaptation, rather than a basic component of personality, in part due to the relatively large gender difference in agency with masculine individuals tending to behave more agentic. However, the psychometric overlap between agency and the most closely linked big five dimension, extraversion, is not well-established, and no behavior genetic work has documented evidence concerning the role of genetic and environmental influences. It is unclear whether agency is more similar to a personality trait, with no evidence of shared environmental influence and moderate heritability, or a characteristic adaptation, with some evidence for shared environmental influence and possibly lower heritability. We used the Midlife Development in the United States study to examine agency, big five, and generativity with replication and robustness check (Nnon-twins = 5,194; Ntwins = 1,914; NMilwaukee = 592). Results indicated that agency was higher in men (d = -.24), moderately heritable (44.4%), strongly correlated with extraversion (r = .51), moderately correlated with generativity (r = .36), and that approximately 40% of the variance in agency was shared with the big five. Agency also changed strongly with extraversion and openness, but less so generativity. Altogether, these results indicate that agency functions similar to other basic personality dimensions but is not clearly a dispositional trait.

References
1.
Vukasovic T, Bratko D . Heritability of personality: A meta-analysis of behavior genetic studies. Psychol Bull. 2015; 141(4):769-85. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000017. View

2.
Bleidorn W, Klimstra T, Denissen J, Rentfrow P, Potter J, Gosling S . Personality maturation around the world: a cross-cultural examination of social-investment theory. Psychol Sci. 2013; 24(12):2530-40. DOI: 10.1177/0956797613498396. View

3.
Kandler C, Zapko-Willmes A, Rauthmann J . Broad and narrow environmental and genetic sources of personality differences: An extended twin family study. J Pers. 2022; 92(1):55-72. DOI: 10.1111/jopy.12777. View

4.
Morgenroth T, Ryan M . The Effects of Gender Trouble: An Integrative Theoretical Framework of the Perpetuation and Disruption of the Gender/Sex Binary. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020; 16(6):1113-1142. PMC: 8564221. DOI: 10.1177/1745691620902442. View

5.
Abele A, Hauke N, Peters K, Louvet E, Szymkow A, Duan Y . Facets of the Fundamental Content Dimensions: Agency with Competence and Assertiveness-Communion with Warmth and Morality. Front Psychol. 2016; 7:1810. PMC: 5118442. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01810. View