» Articles » PMID: 38352025

Cognitive Flexibility Training for Chronic Pain: a Randomized Clinical Study

Overview
Journal Pain Rep
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Date 2024 Feb 14
PMID 38352025
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Previous studies suggest an association between cognitive flexibility and development of chronic pain after surgery. It is not known whether cognitive flexibility can be improved in patients with chronic pain.

Objectives: This study tested whether a neurocognitive training program results in improved cognitive flexibility and pain in patients with chronic pain.

Methods: We conducted a single-center, prospective, randomized study investigating 5-week daily neurocognitive training in patients with chronic pain. Participants (n = 145) were randomized into neurocognitive training or care as usual, and they completed assessments at baseline, posttreatment, and 3 months. The treatment group was asked to spend 35 minutes daily completing a program with tasks on cognitive flexibility, memory, attention, and speed. The primary outcome was performance on the neurocognitive performance test (NCPT). Secondary outcomes included levels of pain interference and severity.

Results: At 5 weeks, the treatment group showed greater improvements on NCPT compared with the control group ( = 0.37); effect size was smaller at 3 months ( = 0.18). The treatment group reported lower pain severity at 5 weeks ( = 0.16) and 3 months ( = 0.39) than the control group, but pain interference was only lower at 3 months ( = 0.20).

Conclusions: Outcomes suggest that using neurocognitive training to modify cognitive flexibility in patients with chronic pain may improve pain severity. This study provided effect size estimates to inform sample size calculations for randomized controlled trials to test the effectiveness of neurocognitive interventions for the prevention and treatment of chronic pain.

Citing Articles

Resting-state brain activity as a biomarker of chronic pain impairment and a mediator of its association with pain resilience.

You B, Wen H, Jackson T Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(10):e26780.

PMID: 38984446 PMC: 11234141. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26780.

References
1.
Nichols A, Maner J . The good-subject effect: investigating participant demand characteristics. J Gen Psychol. 2008; 135(2):151-65. DOI: 10.3200/GENP.135.2.151-166. View

2.
Apkarian V, Hashmi J, Baliki M . Pain and the brain: specificity and plasticity of the brain in clinical chronic pain. Pain. 2010; 152(3 Suppl):S49-S64. PMC: 3045648. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.11.010. View

3.
Brockmeyer T, Ingenerf K, Walther S, Wild B, Hartmann M, Herzog W . Training cognitive flexibility in patients with anorexia nervosa: a pilot randomized controlled trial of cognitive remediation therapy. Int J Eat Disord. 2013; 47(1):24-31. DOI: 10.1002/eat.22206. View

4.
Apkarian A, Sosa Y, Krauss B, Thomas P, Fredrickson B, Levy R . Chronic pain patients are impaired on an emotional decision-making task. Pain. 2004; 108(1-2):129-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.12.015. View

5.
Clausen A, Thelen J, Francisco A, Bruce J, Martin L, McDowd J . Computer-Based Executive Function Training for Combat Veterans With PTSD: A Pilot Clinical Trial Assessing Feasibility and Predictors of Dropout. Front Psychiatry. 2019; 10:62. PMC: 6405637. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00062. View