Analysis of Laboratory Critical Values During COVID-19 Pandemic at Tertiary Hospital in Saudi Arabia

Overview

Journal Int J Gen Med

Publisher Dove Medical Press

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2024 Feb 8

PMID 38327817

Authors

Mohammed A Jeraiby

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: One of the most important aspects of post-analytical laboratory activity is the notification of critical results. Therefore, the aim of this study was to illustrate and analyze the prevalence of critical result values of our clinical laboratory investigations during the pandemic stages of coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) and other research pre-pandemic stages.

Methods: The seven-month study was conducted between May 2020 and November 2020. Laboratory data of critical results were collected in this retrospective cohort.

Results: In total, 221,384 routine tests and 84,451 STAT tests were performed in our clinical laboratory. Of the 3183 (1.44%) tests result was identified as having Critical values, consisting of 2220 (69.74%) and 963 (30.25%) tests in biochemistry and hematology assays. Among the tests with critical values, 39.6% of which were from emergency department (ED) as STAT testing (1262) and 60.3% (1921) as TAT testing. Testing was found in routine inpatients and outpatients, 58% and 2.3%, respectively, and the most frequent parameter notified was sodium.

Conclusion: In our practice, we observed that the higher level of frequency of critical values results is related to inpatients, contradicting several researchers reporting that the higher percentages of critical values were from ED.

References

Sun S, Garcia J, Hayden J . Repeating Critical Hematology and Coagulation Values Wastes Resources, Lengthens Turnaround Time, and Delays Clinical Action. Am J Clin Pathol. 2018; 149(3):247-252. DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqx156. View

Nieto-Torres J, DeDiego M, Verdia-Baguena C, Jimenez-Guardeno J, Regla-Nava J, Fernandez-Delgado R . Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus envelope protein ion channel activity promotes virus fitness and pathogenesis. PLoS Pathog. 2014; 10(5):e1004077. PMC: 4006877. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004077. View

Zhou F, Zhao B, Gu D . Evaluation of laboratory critical serum potassium values and their association with clinical symptoms in Chinese Han patients. J Int Med Res. 2015; 43(6):851-61. DOI: 10.1177/0300060515576011. View

Howanitz J, Howanitz P . Evaluation of total serum calcium critical values. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006; 130(6):828-30. DOI: 10.5858/2006-130-828-EOTSCC. View

cihakova D, Streiff M, Menez S, Chen T, Gilotra N, Michos E . High-value laboratory testing for hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a review. Future Virol. 2021; . PMC: 8457535. DOI: 10.2217/fvl-2020-0316. View

Kelly A, Levine M . Hypocalcemia in the critically ill patient. J Intensive Care Med. 2011; 28(3):166-77. DOI: 10.1177/0885066611411543. View

Dighe A, Rao A, Coakley A, Lewandrowski K . Analysis of laboratory critical value reporting at a large academic medical center. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006; 125(5):758-64. DOI: 10.1309/R53X-VC2U-5CH6-TNG8. View

Jafari E, Zarnegar F, Kalantari M, Dabiri S, Naghibzadeh-Tahami A . Critical Values in Laboratory Tests of Iranian Patients Referring to Laboratories: A Cross-sectional Study in Kerman. Arch Iran Med. 2021; 24(6):473-477. DOI: 10.34172/aim.2021.68. View

LUNDBERG G, Iverson C, RADULESCU G . Now read this: the SI units are here. JAMA. 1986; 255(17):2329-39. View

10.

Kost G . Critical limits for urgent clinician notification at US medical centers. JAMA. 1990; 263(5):704-7. View

11.

LUNDBERG G . Critical (panic) value notification: an established laboratory practice policy (parameter). JAMA. 1990; 263(5):709. View

12.

Kuperman G, Boyle D, Jha A, Rittenberg E, Maluf N, Tanasijevic M . How promptly are inpatients treated for critical laboratory results?. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998; 5(1):112-9. PMC: 61280. DOI: 10.1136/jamia.1998.0050112. View

13.

Kost G . Critical limits for emergency clinician notification at United States children's hospitals. Pediatrics. 1991; 88(3):597-603. View

14.

Lippi G, Mattiuzzi C . Critical laboratory values communication: summary recommendations from available guidelines. Ann Transl Med. 2016; 4(20):400. PMC: 5107409. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2016.09.36. View

15.

Howanitz P, Steindel S, Heard N . Laboratory critical values policies and procedures: a college of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study in 623 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002; 126(6):663-9. DOI: 10.5858/2002-126-0663-LCVPAP. View

16.

Imrie C, Allam B, Ferguson J . Hypocalcaemia of acute pancreatitis: the effect of hypoalbuminaemia. Curr Med Res Opin. 1976; 4(2):101-16. DOI: 10.1185/03007997609109289. View

17.

Piva E, Pelloso M, Penello L, Plebani M . Laboratory critical values: automated notification supports effective clinical decision making. Clin Biochem. 2014; 47(13-14):1163-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.05.056. View

18.

Ranson J . Etiological and prognostic factors in human acute pancreatitis: a review. Am J Gastroenterol. 1982; 77(9):633-8. View

19.

Howanitz J, Howanitz P . Evaluation of serum and whole blood sodium critical values. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006; 127(1):56-9. DOI: 10.1309/Q3Y27QQLEL19340A. View

20.

. Laboratory critical limits. JAMA. 1990; 264(3):334-5. View