» Articles » PMID: 38316954

Publics' Knowledge Of, Attitude to and Motivation Towards Health-related Genomics: a Scoping Review

Overview
Journal Eur J Hum Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2024 Feb 5
PMID 38316954
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The use of genomic data in research and genomic information in clinical care is increasing as technologies advance and sequencing costs decrease. Using Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) theory as a framework we reviewed recent literature examining publics' current knowledge of, attitude to, and motivation towards health-related genomics in clinical and research settings. The population of interest was described as 'publics' to denote the heterogeneity of 'the public'. Eligible studies were published in English between 2016-2022. We retrieved 1657 records, with 278 full-text reviewed against the eligibility criteria and concept definitions. In total, 99 articles were included in the review and descriptive numerical summaries were collated. Knowledge literature was categorized using deductive thematic analysis. For attitude and motivation, literature was coded using an analytic framework developed by the authors. There was wide variability in concept definition and measurement across studies. Overall, there was general positivity about genomics, with high awareness but little familiarity or factual knowledge. Publics had high expectations of genomics and perceived that it could provide them with information for their future. Only a few key attitudes were found to be important as motivators or barriers for participation in genomics; these were related to personal and clinical utility of the information. Context was often missing from studies, decreasing the utility of findings for implementation or public engagement. Future research would benefit by using theory-driven approaches to assess relevant publics' knowledge and attitudes of specific contexts or applications to support genomic implementation and informed decision-making.

Citing Articles

Using a behaviour-change approach to support uptake of population genomic screening and management options for breast or prostate cancer.

Fehlberg Z, Fisher L, Liu C, Kugenthiran N, Milne R, Young M Eur J Hum Genet. 2024; 33(1):108-120.

PMID: 39532988 PMC: 11711511. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-024-01729-1.


Hitting the heights with CiteScore.

McNeill A Eur J Hum Genet. 2024; 32(7):743-744.

PMID: 38956180 PMC: 11219711. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-024-01651-6.

References
1.
Kononova S, Vinokurova D, Barashkov N, Semenova A, Sofronova S, Oksana S . The attitude of young people in the city of Yakutsk to DNA-testing. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2021; 80(1):1973697. PMC: 8462860. DOI: 10.1080/22423982.2021.1973697. View

2.
ANDERSON J, Meyn M, Shuman C, Zlotnik Shaul R, Mantella L, Szego M . Parents perspectives on whole genome sequencing for their children: qualified enthusiasm?. J Med Ethics. 2016; 43(8):535-539. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103564. View

3.
Little I, Koehly L, Gunter C . Understanding changes in genetic literacy over time and in genetic research participants. Am J Hum Genet. 2022; 109(12):2141-2151. PMC: 9748356. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.11.005. View

4.
Saya S, McIntosh J, Winship I, Milton S, Clendenning M, Kyriakides M . Informed choice and attitudes regarding a genomic test to predict risk of colorectal cancer in general practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2021; 105(4):987-995. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.08.008. View

5.
Mayeur C, Van Hoof W . Citizens' conceptions of the genome: Related values and practical implications in a citizen forum on the use of genomic information. Health Expect. 2021; 24(2):468-477. PMC: 8077069. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13187. View