» Articles » PMID: 29804257

Assessing Patient Readiness for Personalized Genomic Medicine

Abstract

The Human Genome Project and the continuing advances in DNA sequencing technology have ushered in a new era in genomic medicine. Successful translation of genomic medicine into clinical care will require that providers of this information are aware of the level of understanding, attitudes, perceived risks, benefits, and concerns of their patients. We used a mixed methods approach to conduct in-depth interviews with participants in the NCI-funded Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR). Our goal was to gain a better understanding of attitudes towards different types and amounts of genomic information, current interest in pursuing genomic testing, and perceived risks and benefits. We interviewed 32 women from the six BCFR sites in the USA, Canada, and Australia. In this sample of women with a personal or family history of breast cancer, we found high acknowledgement of the potential of genetics/genomics to improve their own health and that of their family members through lifestyle changes or alterations in their medical management. Respondents were more familiar with cancer genetics than the genetics of other diseases. Concerns about the testing itself included a potential sense of loss of control over health, feelings of guilt on passing on a mutation to a child, loss of privacy and confidentiality, questions about the test accuracy, and the potential uncertainty of the significance of test results. These data provide important insights into attitudes about the introduction of increasingly complex genetic testing, to inform interventions to prepare individuals for the introduction of this new technology into their clinical care.

Citing Articles

Exploring Literacy and Knowledge Gaps and Disparities in Genetics and Oncogenomics Among Cancer Patients and the General Population: A Scoping Review.

Nikitara K, Cardoso M, Vicente A, Batalha Silva Rasga C, De Angelis R, Chamoun Morel Z Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 39857147 PMC: 11765264. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13020121.


Publics' knowledge of, attitude to and motivation towards health-related genomics: a scoping review.

Pearce A, Mitchell L, Best S, Young M, Terrill B Eur J Hum Genet. 2024; 32(7):747-758.

PMID: 38316954 PMC: 11220043. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-024-01547-5.


Perception of genomic newborn screening among peripartum mothers.

Prosenc B, Sajko M, Kavsek G, Herzog M, Peterlin B Eur J Hum Genet. 2023; 32(2):163-170.

PMID: 38110644 PMC: 10853238. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01497-4.


Personal Genomes in Practice: Exploring Citizen and Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Personalized Genomic Medicine and Personal Health Data Spaces Using a Mixed-Methods Design.

Tommel J, Kenis D, Lambrechts N, Brohet R, Swysen J, Mollen L Genes (Basel). 2023; 14(4).

PMID: 37107544 PMC: 10137790. DOI: 10.3390/genes14040786.


Protocol to evaluate a pilot program to upskill clinicians in providing genetic testing for familial melanoma.

Primiero C, Finnane A, Yanes T, Peach B, Soyer H, McInerney-Leo A PLoS One. 2022; 17(12):e0275926.

PMID: 36477719 PMC: 9728910. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275926.


References
1.
John E, Hopper J, Beck J, Knight J, Neuhausen S, Senie R . The Breast Cancer Family Registry: an infrastructure for cooperative multinational, interdisciplinary and translational studies of the genetic epidemiology of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2004; 6(4):R375-89. PMC: 468645. DOI: 10.1186/bcr801. View

2.
Lubitz R, Komaromy M, Crawford B, Beattie M, Lee R, Luce J . Development and pilot evaluation of novel genetic educational materials designed for an underserved patient population. Genet Test. 2007; 11(3):276-90. DOI: 10.1089/gte.2007.0012. View

3.
Phillips K, Liang S, Van Bebber S . Challenges to the translation of genomic information into clinical practice and health policy: Utilization, preferences and economic value. Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2008; 10(3):260-6. PMC: 2910510. View

4.
Shiloh S, Drori E, Orr-Urtreger A, Friedman E . Being 'at-risk' for developing cancer: cognitive representations and psychological outcomes. J Behav Med. 2008; 32(2):197-208. DOI: 10.1007/s10865-008-9178-z. View

5.
Biesecker L, Mullikin J, Facio F, Turner C, Cherukuri P, Blakesley R . The ClinSeq Project: piloting large-scale genome sequencing for research in genomic medicine. Genome Res. 2009; 19(9):1665-74. PMC: 2752125. DOI: 10.1101/gr.092841.109. View