» Articles » PMID: 38300921

Psychometric Properties of the Brazilian-Portuguese Flow State Scale Short (FSS-BR-S)

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2024 Feb 1
PMID 38300921
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

"Flow experience" is a term used to describe the state of being fully immersed in what you are doing. The Flow State Scale (FSS-2) was developed to assess how people feel when they are in the flow state while participating in certain sports activities. The goal of this study was to obtain a short adapted version of the FSS-2 for the Brazilian-Portuguese language and for general activities (FSS-BR-S). To do this, we translated it both ways (forwards and backwards) and verified that the translation was accurate. Methods: After getting answers from 396 Brazilian participants, we performed (1) the construct validity of the FSS-BR-S and (2) the psychometric item quality analysis. The confirmatory factorial analysis shows that a FSS-BR-S factorial model is the best fit for the data (χ2 = 44.36, p = .023, df = 27, χ2/df = 1.64, CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.98, and RMSEA = 0.04). Reliability tests done in this structure show that the FSS-BR-S (which only has nine items) has good internal consistency. The item quality analysis reveals that its difficulty and differentiating parameters are good for estimating the overall flow state. The test information curve for the short version demonstrates that it is very useful for estimating the flow states of each disposition. Discussion and Conclusions: Based on these findings, we can conclude that the FSS-BR-S has demonstrated sufficient validity to be used with Brazilians.

References
1.
Li C . Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behav Res Methods. 2015; 48(3):936-49. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7. View

2.
Huang L, Hu F, Wu C, Yang Y, Lee S, Fang Y . Traditional-Chinese Dispositional Flow Scale-2 and Flow State Scale-2 in Taiwanese subjects with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2019; 274:287-293. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.093. View

3.
Prinsen C, Vohra S, Rose M, Boers M, Tugwell P, Clarke M . How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a "Core Outcome Set" - a practical guideline. Trials. 2016; 17(1):449. PMC: 5020549. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1555-2. View

4.
Raykov T . Scale Reliability, Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha, and Violations of Essential Tau-Equivalence with Fixed Congeneric Components. Multivariate Behav Res. 2016; 32(4):329-53. DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3204_2. View

5.
Chiarotto A, Bishop A, Foster N, Duncan K, Afolabi E, Ostelo R . Item response theory evaluation of the biomedical scale of the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale. PLoS One. 2018; 13(9):e0202539. PMC: 6135359. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202539. View