» Articles » PMID: 38297466

Complementarity Between the Updated Version of the Front-of-pack Nutrition Label Nutri-Score and the Food-processing NOVA Classification

Abstract

Objective: To compare the initial and the updated versions of the front-of-pack label Nutri-Score (related to the nutritional content) with the NOVA classification (related to the degree of food processing) at the food level.

Design: Using the OpenFoodFacts database - 129,950 food products - we assessed the complementarity between the Nutri-Score (initial and updated) with the NOVA classification through a correspondence analysis. Contingency tables between the two classification systems were used.

Settings: The food offer in France.

Participants: Not applicable.

Results: With both versions (i.e. initial and updated) of the Nutri-Score, the majority of ultra-processed products received medium to poor Nutri-Score ratings (between 77·9 % and 87·5 % of ultra-processed products depending on the version of the algorithm). Overall, the update of the Nutri-Score algorithm led to a reduction in the number of products rated A and B and an increase in the number of products rated D or E for all NOVA categories, with unprocessed foods being the least impacted (-3·8 percentage points (-5·2 %) rated A or B and +1·3 percentage points (+12·9 %) rated D or E) and ultra-processed foods the most impacted (-9·8 percentage points (-43·4 %) rated A or B and +7·8 percentage points (+14·1 %) rated D or E). Among ultra-processed foods rated favourably with the initial Nutri-Score, artificially sweetened beverages, sweetened plant-based drinks and bread products were the most penalised categories by the revision of Nutri-Score while low-sugar flavoured waters, fruit and legume preparations were the least affected.

Conclusion: These results indicate that the update of the Nutri-Score reinforces its coherence with the NOVA classification, even though both systems measure two distinct health dimensions at the food level.

Citing Articles

Nova fails to appreciate the value of plant-based meat and dairy alternatives in the diet.

Messina M, Messina V J Food Sci. 2025; 90(2):e70039.

PMID: 39929603 PMC: 11810565. DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.70039.


Nutritional quality of diet characterized by the Nutri-Score profiling system and cardiovascular disease risk: a prospective study in 7 European countries.

Deschasaux-Tanguy M, Huybrechts I, Julia C, Hercberg S, Sarda B, Fialon M Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024; 46():101006.

PMID: 39529812 PMC: 11551499. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101006.


Food Consumption According to the NOVA Food Classification and Its Relationship with Symptoms of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress in Women.

de Farias Xavier D, de Moraes R, Viana T, Pereira J, da Costa P, Duarte D Nutrients. 2024; 16(21).

PMID: 39519567 PMC: 11547796. DOI: 10.3390/nu16213734.


Evidence on consumers' perceptions, understanding and uses of the Nutri-Score to improve communication about its update: a qualitative study with shopping observations in France.

Cerf M, Serry A, Marty L, Nicklaus S, Ducrot P BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):3037.

PMID: 39497099 PMC: 11533413. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20092-w.


Ultra-Processed Foods: A Narrative Review of the Impact on the Human Gut Microbiome and Variations in Classification Methods.

Brichacek A, Florkowski M, Abiona E, Frank K Nutrients. 2024; 16(11).

PMID: 38892671 PMC: 11174918. DOI: 10.3390/nu16111738.


References
1.
. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality and life expectancy, 1950-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018; 392(10159):1684-1735. PMC: 6227504. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31891-9. View

2.
Monteiro C, Levy R, Claro R, de Castro I, Cannon G . Increasing consumption of ultra-processed foods and likely impact on human health: evidence from Brazil. Public Health Nutr. 2011; 14(1):5-13. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980010003241. View

3.
Pagliai G, Dinu M, Madarena M, Bonaccio M, Iacoviello L, Sofi F . Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Nutr. 2020; 125(3):308-318. PMC: 7844609. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114520002688. View

4.
Adriouch S, Julia C, Kesse-Guyot E, Ducrot P, Peneau S, Mejean C . Association between a dietary quality index based on the food standard agency nutrient profiling system and cardiovascular disease risk among French adults. Int J Cardiol. 2017; 234:22-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.02.092. View

5.
Askari M, Heshmati J, Shahinfar H, Tripathi N, Daneshzad E . Ultra-processed food and the risk of overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Int J Obes (Lond). 2020; 44(10):2080-2091. DOI: 10.1038/s41366-020-00650-z. View